Parenting is costly and because the relationship between the mother and embryos is not mutualistic, mother–offspring conflicts may exist whenever resource are scarce. However, intergenerational trade‐offs and conflicts resulting from limited access to water, a vital and depreciable resource, remain largely overlooked. In this study, we examined the physiological, reproductive and life‐history responses to water restriction in the European Common Lizard (Zootoca vivipara). We hypothesized that, under water‐limited conditions, pregnant females experience both short‐term and long‐term physiological impacts (dehydration and stress) underlying an allocation trade‐off for water between mothers and offspring. Water restriction led to a decrease in body mass, and an increase in plasma osmolality (dehydration) and corticosterone concentration in both males and females. The extent of the dehydration was positively correlated with fecundity in females. This suggests a trade‐off between maternal water balance and allocation of water to developing embryos during reproduction. Water restriction had no immediate effect on reproductive output or offspring morphology at birth. Yet, water restriction in pregnant females enhanced their reproductive effort the following year but reduced the early life growth and annual survival of their second‐year offspring. These delayed fitness responses to water restriction in offspring and mothers suggest that water can trigger intergenerational conflicts as demonstrated for energy. Although the mediation of this conflict remains to be clarified, we hypothesized that it represents a selective force that influences reproductive strategies. A http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13009/suppinfo is available for this article.
Behavioral fight responses to desiccation risk are important to predict the vulnerability of terrestrial animals to climate change and yet, they have received little attention so far. In terrestrial ectotherms, behavioral regulation of the water balance (i.e. hydroregulation) is likely to be plastic and may tradeoff with thermoregulation behavior because water loss rates are generally higher in warmer environments and body temperatures. When low water availability and heat stress cause physiological dehydration, we expect to highlight a shift to behavioral water‐conservation strategies including changes in activity patterns, micro‐habitat selection and thermoregulation strategies. Here, we compared the behavior of adult common lizards Zootoca vivipara in indoor arenas that either had a permanent access to water or underwent a one‐week long experimental water restriction. Water‐restricted lizards reduced their behavioral activity, selected more often cooler and wetter refuges during daytime, and performed less accurate thermoregulation than control lizards. The activity of water‐restricted gravid females shifted towards the cooler and wetter early hours of the day. In addition, they had lower body temperatures and preferred lower body temperatures at the end of the experiment (i.e. thermal depression). Water‐restricted lizards suffered from a mild physiological dehydration and had a lower mass change. Heat stress was simulated every second day, which led to a range of heat avoidance and water conservation strategies independent from water restriction. Altogether, these results confirm that chronic water restriction and dehydration induce responses towards water conservation that conflict with thermoregulation accuracy.
Seasonal organisms use temperature as a cue in reproductive decisions, but the role of climate change is not yet clear. Here, an experimental increase in temperature during laying in a small passerine bird reveals that heated females adjusted their incubation behavior and the number of eggs laid, and produced nestlings of equal condition over the season, unlike control females. A small temperature increase may therefore influence breeding strategy and offspring phenotype.
1. Reproduction involves considerable reorganization in an organism's physiology that incurs potential toxicity for cells (e.g., oxidative stress) and decrease in fitness. This framework has been the cornerstone of the so-called 'oxidative cost of reproduction', a theory that remains controversial and relatively overlooked in non-model ectotherms.2. Here, we used two complementary approaches in natural and controlled conditions to test whether altered access to climate conditions (water and temperature resources) alters oxidative status and mediates reproductive trade-offs in viviparous populations of the common lizard (Zootoca vivipara).3. First, we examined whether access to free-standing water and differences in ambient temperature across 12 natural populations could be related to variation in oxidative status, reproductive effort and reproductive success. Second, we determined whether an experimental restriction to water triggers higher oxidative cost of reproduction and correlates with fitness measures (reproductive success, future survival rate and probability of future reproduction). 4. Pregnant females exhibited higher sensitivity than males to natural or experimental limitations in temperature and water access. That is, in restricted environments, pregnant females with higher reproductive effort exhibited stronger oxidative damage despite enhanced non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity. 5. Enhanced antioxidant defensive capacity in pregnant females was positively correlated with higher reproductive success, whereas elevated oxidative damage negatively correlated with offspring annual survival.6. Altogether, our results revealed a context-dependent oxidative cost of reproduction that was concomitant with a conflict in water demand from offspring. These new insights should be critical for understanding ectotherm responses to heat waves and summer droughts that are increasing in frequency and duration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.