Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is used sporadically for renal replacement therapy in Europe but not in the US. Characteristics and outcomes were compared for patients receiving HDF versus hemodialysis (HD) in five European countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. The study followed 2165 patients from 1998 to 2001, stratified into four groups: low- and high-flux HD, and low- and high-efficiency HDF. Patient characteristics including age, sex, 14 comorbid conditions, and time on dialysis were compared between each group using multivariate logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed adjusted differences in mortality risk. Prevalence of HDF ranged from 1.8% in Spain to 20.1% in Italy. Compared to low-flux HD, patients receiving low-efficiency HDF had significantly longer average duration of end-stage renal disease (7.0 versus 4.7 years), more history of cancer (15.4 versus 8.7%), and lower phosphorus (5.3 versus 5.6 mg/dl); patients receiving high-efficiency HDF had significantly more lung disease (15.5 versus 10.2%) and received a higher single-pool Kt/V (1.44 versus 1.35). High-efficiency HDF patients had lower crude mortality rates than low-flux HD patients. After adjustment, high-efficiency HDF patients had a significant 35% lower mortality risk than those receiving low-flux HD (relative risk=0.65, P=0.01). These observational results suggest that HDF may improve patient survival independently of its higher dialysis dose. Owing to possible selection bias, the potential benefits of HDF must be tested by controlled clinical trials before recommendations can be made for clinical practice.

C ardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. 1,2 Aortic stiffness, which results in increased pulse pressure (PP), cardiac overload, and left ventricular hypertrophy, is an established predictor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease. [3][4][5] Physiologically, the aorta is much more elastic than peripheral muscular arteries providing a physiological stiffness gradient. This physiological gradient of stiffness generates reflecting sites, which dampens the transmission of forward travelling pressure into the microcirculation. In normal aging, aortic stiffness increases to a greater extent than peripheral muscular arteries, resulting in equalization or even reversal of stiffness gradient (aortic stiffness>muscular artery stiffness), referred to as stiffness mismatch. 6-9 Attenuation or reversal of physiological stiffness gradient has been proposed to cause vascular damage through enhanced transmission of forward travelling wave energy into the microcirculation. 9,10In a longitudinal study with repeated measures of aortic and brachial stiffness in hemodialysis patients, we observed an accelerated progression of aortic stiffness and a significant reduction in brachial stiffness. 11 The regression of brachial stiffness was associated to higher degree of aortic stiffness, therefore, leading to an enhanced aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch. In the context of this study, we hypothesized that aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch, as evaluated by the ratio of aortic and brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV) ratio, may prove to be a better prognostic predictor of mortality in dialysis population than aortic PWV. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to examine the nonadjusted and adjusted effect of the PWV ratio on overall mortality and to study its relative predictive value as compared with well-known central and peripheral hemodynamic parameters.Abstract-We hypothesized that increased aortic stiffness (central elastic artery) combined with a decrease in brachial stiffness (peripheral muscular artery) leads to the reversal of the physiological stiffness gradient (ie, mismatch), promoting end-organ damages through increased forward pressure wave transmission into the microcirculation. We, therefore, examined the effect of aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch on mortality in patients in need of dialysis. In a prospective observational study, aortic-brachial arterial stiffness mismatch (pulse wave velocity ratio) was assessed using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity divided by carotid-radial pulse wave velocity in 310 adult patients on dialysis. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 146 (47%) deaths occurred. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality related to PWV ratio in a Cox regression analysis was 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.64; P<0.001 per 1 SD) and was still significant after adjustments for confounding factors, such as age, dialysis vintage, sex, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, and weight (HR...

No abstract