Objectives The introduction of a new technology has the potential to modify clinical practices, especially if easy to use, reliable and non-invasive. This observational before/after multicenter service evaluation compares fluid management practices during surgery (with fluids volumes as primary outcome), and clinical outcomes (secondary outcomes) before and after the introduction of the Pleth Variability Index (PVI), a non-invasive fluid responsiveness monitoring. Results In five centers, 23 anesthesiologists participated during a 2-years period. Eighty-eight procedures were included. Median fluid volumes infused during surgery were similar before and after PVI introduction (respectively, 1000 ml [interquartile range 25–75 [750–1700] and 1000 ml [750–2000]). The follow-up was complete for 60 from these and outcomes were similar. No detectable change in the fluid management was observed after the introduction of a new technology in low to moderate risk surgery. These results suggest that the introduction of a new technology should be associated with an implementation strategy if it is intended to be associated with changes in clinical practice.

No abstract

output might flow into the right ventricle through a ventricular septal defect more preferentially than into the aorta owing to the difference between systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. Based on the heart-lung interaction mechanism, we assume that a relatively higher pulmonary circulation leads to the reduction in PPV. This correspondence demonstrates that P ET CO 2 has a great effect on PPV, and the theory behind this improves on the understanding of the mechanism of PPV in children with intracardiac shunt.

Objective: Delta pulse pressure and delta down are used as dynamic preload indicators of fluid responsiveness during closed chest surgery. There are few data regarding their accuracy in open chest surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of sternotomy on the accuracy of both delta pulse pressure and delta down. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Single institution, nonacademic hospital. Participants: The study comprised 127 adult patients scheduled for elective open chest cardiac surgery. Interventions: Delta pulse pressure and delta down were calculated for all patients before and 10 minutes after sternotomy. Measurements and Main Results: Statistical analyses were performed to assess the influence of sternotomy on the accuracy of delta down and delta pulse pressure. Mann-Whitney and Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated a significant influence of sternotomy on delta pulse pressure values but not on delta down values. Among patients who had a positive delta down and/or delta pulse pressure before sternotomy, sternotomy significantly modified the delta pulse pressure value (p = 0.02), but not the delta down value (p = 0.22). The kappa coefficient indicated a very good agreement between delta down before and after sternotomy (0.83) and a fair agreement between delta pulse pressure before and after sternotomy (0.4). The difference between kappa coefficients was highly significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Within the study population, sternotomy significantly influenced delta pulse pressure but not delta down. In this preliminary study, delta down appeared to be more accurate to evaluate fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery than did delta pulse pressure. Before promoting delta down in current practice, confirmation is needed on a larger scale.