Seventeen children with Down syndrome (mean chronological age 9 years 3 months, mean mental age 4 years 3 months) were individually matched for verbal mental age or chronological age with two groups of normal children. Each child drew a man from imagination and a man from a model. The drawings were scored using Koppitz's (1968) system. The normal 9-year-old children produced consistently higher scores than either of the other groups. The children with DS differed from the other groups in that they did not show an improvement in the model task. In addition, whereas the normal 4-year-olds' drawing scores correlated with mental age those of the children with DS did not. These results are discussed in terms of the developmental difference debate; in particular, the results provide some evidence for a qualitative difference in the developmental pattern of children with DS.
This article examines the jurisdictional awards in two pending ICSID cases against Argentina-Abaclat and Ambiente-that allowed a multitude of Italian bondholders affected by Argentina's sovereign debt default to collectively use the investment treaty arbitration process, without requiring any additional or specific consent from the state.Such collective proceedings raise complex issues in relation to the state consentcentric paradigm of international investment law. The article considers the following distinct, but nevertheless interrelated, matters arising from the Abaclat and Ambiente awards, in an attempt to identify a taxonomy of collective or multi-party claims in international investment law: (i) characterisation of the nature of the proceedings; (ii) whether a host state's general consent to arbitration can be taken to include consent to being sued by multiple investors in one and the same arbitral proceeding; (iii) interpretation of the silence regarding the issue of collective proceedings in the current legal framework under the ICSID Convention; and (iv) whether collective proceedings require a certain link or relationship between the co-claimants, their respective investments and/or claims.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.