No abstract

A common thread among health behavior theories is the importance of perceived control, often defined within the health psychology literature as locus of control. Inconsistencies have been found regarding the role of locus of control in predicting health behaviors. These inconsistencies may be resolved by exploring interactions between internal locus of control and other perceived control constructs such as self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. The present study tested the interaction of internal locus of control, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in relation to HbA1c in patients with Type 2 diabetes. One hundred and nine medical patients who were diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, predominantly from an African American as well as disadvantaged background, participated in the study. HbA1c was used to indicate gradations of medical regimen adherence. A three way interaction among the perceived control measures was related to HbA1c. Patients who reported low self-efficacy and low outcome expectancy tended to benefit the most from high internal locus of control. However, for patients with low self-efficacy and high outcome expectancy, higher scores on internal locus of control were related to poorer HbA1c levels. Future research examining perceived control constructs may benefit from investigating the interacting effects of such variables when evaluating health behaviors.

The factors of psychopathy assessment tools diverge in their relationships with numerous problematic behaviors and psychological disorders. Emotion dysregulation is a pathological process argued to cut across diagnoses, and may be important in better understanding these divergent associations. This study sought to clarify psychopathy's association with emotion regulation difficulties. It was predicted that the Fearless Dominance and Self-Centered Impulsivity factors of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised would demonstrate differential relationships with a multidimensional conceptualization of emotion regulation difficulties. Ninety-one male undergraduate students and 28 male court-mandated anger management participants completed self-report questionnaires measuring emotion regulation difficulties and psychopathic personality characteristics. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that emotion regulation difficulties were negatively associated with Fearless Dominance psychopathic traits, but positively associated with Self-Centered Impulsivity and global psychopathic traits. In addition, emotion regulation difficulties explained incremental variance in psychopathic traits over and above negative affect alone. These findings may have clinical implications for the etiology and treatment of psychopathic personality disorder.

Objective The Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale's (PHLMS) psychometric properties, theoretical assumptions, convergent validity, and relationships to symptom, happiness and social desirability measures were investigated in novel samples. Methods Internet‐recruited general public samples of experienced meditators (n = 67, 21 male, 46 female, average age 50) and nonmeditators (n = 61, 28 male, 32 female, and 1 transgender; average age 41.9) were used. Results Meditators scored higher than nonmeditators on both PHLMS Acceptance, t(126) = 2.77, p < .01, d = 0.49, and Awareness t(126) = 4.18, p < .01, d = 0.74. Higher PHLMS Acceptance subscale scores were associated with decreased scores on all symptom measures in nonmeditators, but only in select measures among meditators. Generally, PHLMS Awareness subscale scores were not related to symptoms. Awareness interacted with meditator status on outcome measures. Conclusions PHLMS may be used in the general public and experienced meditator populations. Mindfulness facets become intercorrelated in experienced meditators.

No abstract