1 Linopirdine (DuP 996) has been shown to enhance depolarization-induced release of several neurotransmitters in the CNS through a mechanism which may involve K+ channel blockade. The electrophysiological effects of linopirdine were therefore investigated directly, by use of conventional voltage recording and single electrode voltage-clamp.2 Linopirdine (10 gM) reduced spike frequency adaptation (SFA) in rat hippocampal CAl pyramidal neurones in vitro. The reduction of SFA comprised an increase in number of spikes and a reduction in inter-spike intervals after the first, but with no effect on time to first spike. Linopirdine also caused a voltage-dependent depolarization of resting membrane potential (RMP). 3 M-current (IM), a current known to underlie SFA and to set RMP, was blocked by linopirdine in a reversible, concentration-dependent manner (IC50 = 8.5 gM). This block was not reversed by atropine (10 gM).4 Linopirdine did not affect IQ, the slow after-hyperpolarization following a spike train, or spike duration. 5 Linopirdine may represent a novel class of K+ blocker with relative selectivity for the M-current. This block of IM is consistent with the suggestion from a previous study that linopirdine may affect a tetraethylammonium-sensitive channel, and it could be speculated that IM blockade may be involved with the enhancement of neurotransmitter release by linopirdine.

No abstract

The central pattern generator for swimming Xenopus embryo is organized as two half-centres linked by reciprocal inhibition. Microelectrode recordings suggest that Xenopus neurons are poorly excitable, necessitating a key role for postinhibitory rebound in the operation of the central pattern generator. However the Xenopus central pattern generator seems unusual in that the component neurons apparently have no intrinsic or conditional rhythmogenic properties. We have re-examined the firing properties of Xenopus embryo spinal neurons by making patch-clamp recordings in situ from intact spinal cord. Recordings made from 99 neurons were divided into three groups. Central pattern generator neurons overwhelmingly (44/51) fired trains of action potentials in response to current injection. Just over half of the sensory interneurons (13/22) also fired trains of action potentials. Neurons that received no synaptic inputs during swimming mostly fired just one or two action potentials (22/26). Thirty-four neurons were identified morphologically. Commissural (8/12) and descending (6/6) interneurons, key components of the spinal central pattern generator, fired repetitive trains of action potentials during current injection. Neurons that were not part of the central pattern generator did not demonstrate this preponderance for repetitive firing. Analysis of the interspike intervals during current injection revealed that the majority of central pattern generators, descending and commissural interneurons, could readily fire at frequencies up to twice that of swimming. We suggest that Xenopus neurons can be considered as conditional oscillators: in the presence of unpatterned excitation they exhibit an ability to fire rhythmically. This property makes the Xenopus embryonic central pattern generator more similar to other model central pattern generators than has hitherto been appreciated.