Eight subjects were required to localise a sound source (white noise through a speaker) which varied in position on both sides of the head over a range of elevations (-40 degrees to +40 degrees) and azimuths (0 degree to 180 degrees) at 10 degrees intervals. The perceived position of the source was indicated by pointing a special gun. Depression of the trigger activated a photographic system which recorded two views of the subject, the sound source, and the gun. The absolute and algebraic, azimuth and elevation errors were measured for all subjects at each position of the source. The variability of azimuth and elevation error was also computed. In a second experiment, four of the same subjects performed the same task but in this case visually located the sources. This experiment provided an estimate of inherent motor error in the pointing task. No differences in localisation acuity between sides were found, but there were significant differences between front and back regions. Azimuth and elevation error were well matched and low in the front. However, azimuth error increased in the regions behind the head, particularly for azimuth positions 120 degrees to 160 degrees. Larger increases were found for positions in the upper elevations of this region. Elevation error also increased in the upper elevations behind the head. A comparison of the auditory and visual data indicates that this pattern of error is not due to motor factors. The results are discussed in relation to the structural characteristics of the pinnae and modifications that they impose on incoming sound energy.

The acuity of azimuth and elevation discrimination was measured under conditions in which the cues to localisation provided by the pinnae were removed. Four subjects localised a sound source (white noise through a speaker) which varied in position over a range of elevations (-40 degrees to +40 degrees) and azimuths (0 degree to 180 degrees), at 10 degrees intervals, on the left side of the head. Pinna cues were removed by the insertion of individually cast moulds in both pinnae. Each mould had an access hole to the auditory canal. The absolute and algebraic, azimuth and elevation errors were measured for all subjects at each position of the source. The variability of azimuth and elevation error was also computed. The performance of the subjects was compared to their performance under normal hearing conditions. Insertion of the pinnae moulds was found to increase substantially elevation error and the number of front/back reversals. The importance of the cues provided by the pinnae in these discriminations was thus confirmed. However, the increase in elevation error did not result in a corresponding increase in azimuth error. These findings provide support for the proposition that azimuth and elevation discrimination are coded independently.

No abstract

The practical implication of this study is that auditory icons having either direct or strong, indirect associations with warning events should be preferred.

A study is reported in which the acuity of azimuth and elevation discrimination under monaural listening conditions was measured. Six subjects localised a sound source (white noise through a speaker) which varied in position over a range of elevations (-40 degrees to +40 degrees) and azimuths (0 degrees to 180 degrees), at 10 degrees intervals, on the left side of the head. Monaural listening conditions were established by the fitting of an ear defender and one earmuff to the right ear. The absolute and algebraic, azimuth and elevation errors were measured for all subjects at each position of the source. The results indicate that all subjects suffered a marked reduction of azimuth acuity under monaural conditions, although a coarse capacity to discriminate azimuth still remained. Considerable between-subject variability was observed. Front/back discrimination was retained, although it was slightly impaired compared to that observed under normal listening conditions. Elevation discrimination was, on the whole, quite good under monaural conditions. However, a comparison of the performance of these subjects under monaural conditions with that observed under normal listening conditions indicated that some reduction in elevation localisation acuity occurred in the frontal quadrants in the median plane and in the upper quadrants of more lateral source positions. The reduction in acuity seen in these regions is attributed to the loss of information from the pinna of the occluded ear rather than to the observed reduction in azimuth error. The results provide partial support for the binaural pinna disparity model.