Total or subtotal parathyroidectomy is considered the treatment of choice for multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I)-associated primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). However, persistent or recurrent HPT is frequently observed. The development of a rapid two-site immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) method for measuring intact parathormone (PTH) has provided a valuable tool for recognizing possible surgical failures. Our experience includes 16 MEN-I patients (10 females, 6 males) of mean age 35.5 years operated on between 1990 and 1996. Total parathyroidectomy (TPTX) with autotransplantation of parathyroid tissue was the standard treatment. Blood samples for PTH measurement were drawn at the induction of anesthesia (basal value), 10 and 20 minutes after the removal of each gland, and 60 minutes after TPTX. Rapid PTH measurement, which required only 15 minutes of incubation at 37 degrees C, showed a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) with the standard method. Circulating PTH levels exhibited a stepwise decrease during TPTX, reaching a mean value of 22.3% of the baseline 20 minutes after removal of the last gland. Two patients showed a prompt decrease of PTH after removal of the single enlarged gland, featuring the kinetics observed in the adenomas. One of these two patients was successfully treated with more conservative surgery. None of the patients showed persistence or recurrence of HPT. In our experience, intraoperative measurement of PTH seems to be a valuable adjunct in both the diagnosis of multiglandular involvement and the prediction of surgical treatment in patients with primary parathyroid hyperplasia.

Application of PCI in older ACS patients decreased with increasing background risk. This therapeutic attitude could not be justified by decreasing effectiveness of PCI in more compromised patients: conversely, application of PCI was associated with a long-term survival advantage that increased progressively with background risk, as expressed by SC.

Data obtained from the literature review showed that clinical diagnosis of the Hyp-Hyp phenomenon is relatively simple, but it remains more difficult to establish the causal disease. In our opinion, it is advisable to define simple diagnostic standards for the selection of patients at risk of dysautonomic impairment so that a subsequent highly specific diagnostic work-up could be initiated.

No abstract