Objectives To explore women's experience of being diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in relation to the following: response to the diagnosis; understanding about the diagnosis; satisfaction with information; satisfaction with the level of involvement in treatment decision-making and satisfaction with support services.Design An explorative descriptive qualitative design was used to facilitate an in-depth exploration of women's experiences.Setting and participants Five focus group interviews were conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, involving 26 women diagnosed with DCIS.Results DCIS is a non-invasive breast disease, that in most cases will not recur if treated, and cannot of itself metastasize to other parts of the body. However, this study found that women were confused about whether or not they had cancer that could result in death. Women's confusion was compounded by the use of the term ÔcarcinomaÕ and by the recommendation of treatments such as mastectomy. Women's confusion was not alleviated by appropriate information, with most women reporting dissatisfaction with the information they received specifically about DCIS.Conclusions This study identifies that a diagnosis of DCIS has a significant psychological impact on women. The communication challenges highlighted in this study are not only relevant to DCIS but to any other disease in which the natural history is uncertain and the evidence about treatment effectiveness is still emerging. impact on patient outcomes, and how to optimize doctor-patient communication.
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.This empirically derived framework strongly repositions shaping of health workforce training through a genuine partnership lens, strengthening training efforts to support high-quality, person-centred, chronic pain care.
Objective. Chronic pain and cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a high disease burden. This research aimed to understand whether Australian primary health networks (PHNs) are recognising the need for the prevention of these conditions by investigating what local health and service issues have been identified.Methods. Separate sets of needs assessments were analysed for chronic pain and CVD for all 31 PHNs using a document analysis approach. Framework analysis was undertaken to ascertain the types of health and service issues, prevention-related issues and supporting data sources identified, as well as to quantify the number of PHNs identifying these issues.Results. Fewer PHNs identified health issues for chronic pain (n ¼ 13) compared with CVD (n ¼ 30), with the most common being disease prevalence and burden supported by National Health Survey data. Service issues were identified by fewer than half the PHNs (n ¼ 13 for each disease), which were largely informed by stakeholder consultation and related to service integration, service accessibility and health professional training. Prevention-related issues were frequently identified for CVD (n ¼ 26), but not chronic pain (n ¼ 3).Conclusions. This paper highlights the need for a greater focus on chronic pain-and CVD-related issues by PHNs. This could be supported nationally by recognising chronic pain and risk factors in national datasets and PHN performance frameworks, and locally via greater stakeholder consultation to inform PHN population health planning.What is known about the topic? Chronic pain and CVD are the two leading causes of total disease burden in Australia. PHNs are well positioned to address prevention locally through population health planning, supporting primary healthcare providers, health care integration and coordination and commissioning necessary services. What does this paper add? This paper highlights gaps in data availability, the proportion of PHNs identifying local service issues for both chronic pain and CVD and health-and prevention-related issues for chronic pain. What are the implications for practitioners? Although PHNs are constrained by government priorities and funding, greater stakeholder consultation is one potentially promising strategy to overcome local data gaps to identifying and prioritising chronic pain and CVD prevention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.