Considering the significant strain‐hardening and ductility characteristics of stainless steel and the influential role of beam to column joints in the overall response of structures, a clear understanding of their moment rotation behaviour appears fundamental. In the present study, a review of the European design code for three typical semi‐continuous beam‐to‐column joints (extended end plate, flush end plate and top‐and‐seat angle connections) is first carried out. Then, using a hybrid modelling strategy with uncoupled elastic‐plastic springs for the bolts and shell elements for the members, more refined 3D finite element (FE) models are developed and validated against available test results. An equivalent stress definition is then proposed for calculating the joint moment resistance. Finally, the initial rotational stiffness, moment resistance, rotation capacity, and failure patterns are used to evaluate critically the accuracy of the predictions of the European design code. As a result, the need for more comprehensive design guidance in accordance with the observed findings is pointed out.

No abstract

Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs) are one of the widely used lateral load resisting systems that resist lateral forces through the flexural and shear strength of the beams and columns. On the other hand, in these systems, column performance has special importance as the main part of tolerating resistant demands made by earthquake in both directions. The most dominant factor in a MRF is how to transfer moment between parts of the frame. Panel zone is a column region which is surrounded by the continuity plates and column flanges. In this study, firstly evaluates the adequacy of the panel zone relationship in AISC for cruciform columns, box-columns and double-web columns using non-linear finite element analysis method. Then the panel zone shear capacities of these columns that have the same plastic capacity are compared with each other. Part of the results of this study indicate AISC relations that only have considered the effect of web column in shear strength ,so that for cruciform column underestimate shear capacity about 20% less than accurate values and overestimate about 30% in boxed shape column and doubleweb column.-, box-columns, connection

Stainless-steel has proven to be a first-class material with unique mechanical properties for a variety of applications in the building and construction industry. High ductility, strain hardening, durability and aesthetic appeal are only a few of them. From a specific point of view, its nonlinear stress–strain behaviour appears capable of providing a significant increase in the rotational capacity of stainless-steel connections. This, in turn, may provide significant benefits for the overall response of a structure in terms of capacity and ductility. However, the bulk of the research on stainless-steel that has been published so far has mostly ignored the analysis of the deformation capabilities of the stainless-steel connections and has mostly focused on the structural response of individual members, such as beams or columns. For such a reason, the present study aims to contribute to the general understanding of the behaviour of stainless-steel connections from a conceptual, numerical and design standpoint. After a brief review of the available literature, the influence of the use of stainless-steel for column–beam connections is discussed from a theoretical standpoint. As a novel contribution, a different approach to compute the pseudo-plastic moment resistance that takes into account the post-elastic secant stiffness of the stainless-steel is proposed. Successively, a refined finite element model is employed to study the failure of stainless-steel column–beam connections. Finally, a critical assessment of the employment of carbon-steel-based design guidelines for stainless-steel connections provided by the Eurocode 3 design (EN 1993-1-8) is performed. The findings prove the need for the development of novel design approaches and more precise capacity models capable of capturing the actual stainless-steel joint response and their impact on the overall ductility and capacity of the whole structure.