Introduction The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has raised serious concerns about the processes of care and outcomes in adult emergency laparotomies in the UK. To date, no comparable data have been published for children. The aim of this study was to investigate the need for a similar audit in children. Methods Data were collected retrospectively following NELA guidelines. Results were analysed using QuickCalcs (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, US). Results The study period spanned 7.5 years. A total of 161 patients were identified for inclusion in the audit. The median patient age was 2.8 years. Half (49%) of the cohort were deemed ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade ≥2. A history of previous abdominal surgery was noted in 37% of the patients. The median time from admission to operation was 15 hours. Over a third (39%) of the operations were performed out of hours. The most common indications for surgery comprised adhesive bowel obstruction (37%), intussusception (27%) and volvulus (9%). The median length of hospital stay was 8 days with the median postoperative stay being 6 days (NELA data 10.6 days). Half (51%) of the cases required intensive care following surgery. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.1%. The overall mortality rate was 4.3% (NELA data 16%). Patient care was led by a consultant surgeon in 100% of cases (NELA data 89%). Conclusions This is the first study in children that provides baseline data about the standards of care and outcomes from a single centre paediatric emergency laparotomy audit. A larger study using data from multiple centres would be of great benefit.
Congenital choledochal malformations (CCM) may be a cause of abdominal pain, jaundice and sepsis in children but are easily diagnosed with modern ultrasound techniques. A review of the current approach to surgical management is presented together with an updated practical classification of the spectrum of possible anomalies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.