Aims/Introduction: Very few studies assess the effectiveness of different protocols of intermittent very-low calorie diet (VLCD) in patients with diabetes. This study was designed to compare the effects of 2 days/week and 4 days/week of intermittent VLCD on glycemic control, diabetes remission, metabolic parameters and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Materials and Methods: Participants with obesity and type 2 diabetes were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups, consisting of control, 2 days/week and 4 days/ week of intermittent VLCD. In the intermittent VLCD groups, participants received a 600kcal diet per day on restricted days and ad libitum food consumption on non-restricted days. Glycemic control, rate of diabetes remission, metabolic parameters and quality of life were evaluated at baseline, weeks 2, 10 and 20. Results: A total of 40 participants were enrolled. The mean body mass index was 30.1 -5.9 kg/m 2 , and the mean glycated hemoglobin was 7.4 -1.2%. At week 20, there was an improvement in glycemic control in both intermittent VLCD groups with significant decreases in glycated hemoglobin levels and insulin resistance index throughout the study periods. Diabetes remission without the need for medications was equally found in 29% of participants in both intermittent VLCD groups. Serum triglyceride, bodyweight, body mass index and fat mass were also significantly decreased in both VLCD groups. No serious adverse events were encountered. Conclusion: Intermittent VLCD was highly effective in achieving optimal glycemic control. The effects of 2 days/week and 4 days/week of intermittent VLCD on diabetes remission were relatively similar.
Aim: Intermittent very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) provides more flexibility than continuous VLCD to optimize individual results. This study was designed to determine the effects of Intermittent VLCD (2 or 4 days/week) on glycemic control, metabolic parameters and quality of life (QoL) in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Method: 40 participants (mean age 49.6 ± 7.9 years, BMI 30.1 ± 5.9 kg/m2, mean diabetes duration 4.7 ± 3.1 years, mean HbA1C 7.4 ± 1.2%) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 into 3 groups [control (n=12), 2 days/week VLCD (n=14), or 4 days/week VLCD (n=14)]. In the Intermittent VLCD groups, participants received 600 kcal/day in restricted days (2 and 4 non-consecutive days/week) and ad libitum food consumption on non-restricted days for 20 weeks. Metabolic parameters and QoL were evaluated at baseline, 2nd, 10th and 20th week. Results: There was improvement in glycemic control in both intermittent VLCD groups throughout the study period. At the end of study, an intention-to-treat analysis showed that the mean reduction (± SEM) of FPG level was 7.9 (± 13.5), 25.1 (± 12.5) and 39.7 (± 12.5) mg/dl, and HbA1C level was 0.1(± 1.3), 0.7 (± 0.3) and 1.2 (± 0.3) % in the control group, the 2 days/week VLCD group and the 4 days/week VLCD group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the reduction in FPG or HbA1c between the 2 days/week and 4 days/week VLCD groups. The mean difference (± SEM) of FPG level between both groups was 11 mg/dl (95% CI, -17.5 - 39.5 mg/dl) and the mean difference (± SEM) of HbA1C level between both groups was 0.39% (95% CI, -3.3 - 1.1%). Intermittent VLCD was associated with marked improvement in insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, as reflected in HOMA-IR, Matsuda, Disposition, and Insulinogenic indices. QoL was significantly increased in all groups. Conclusion: Intermittent VLCD, 2 days/week or 4 days/week, was equally comparable and effective in achieving glycemic control. Disclosure M. Umphonsathien: None. P. Rattanasian: None. W. Suansawang: None. S. Lokattachariya: None. W. Khovidhunkit: None. Funding National Research Council of Thailand; Health Systems Research Institute
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.