IntroductionEndoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) for pituitary adenoma (PA) has been a recent shift from the traditional microscopic technique. Although some literature demonstrated superiority of ETSS over the microscopic method and some evaluated mono- vs. binostril access within the ETSS, none had explored the potential influence of dedicated instrument, as this procedure had evolved, on patients’ outcomes when compared to traditional microscopic tools.ObjectiveTo investigate our own clinical and radiographic outcomes of ETSS for PA with its technical evolution over time as well as a significance of, having vs. lacking, the special endoscopic tools.MethodsIncluded patients underwent ETSS for PA performed by the first author (AH). Prospectively recorded patients’ data concerning pre-, intra- and postoperative clinical and radiographic assessments were subject to analysis. The three groups of differently evolving ETSS techniques, beginning with mononostril (MN) to binostril ETSS with standard microsurgical instruments (BN1) and, lastly, binostril ETSS with specially-designed endoscopic tools (BN2), were examined for their impact on the intra- and, short- and long-term, postoperative results. Also, the survival after ETSS for PA, as defined by the need for reintervention in each technical group, was appraised.ResultsFrom January 2006 to 2012, there were 47, 101 and 72 ETSS, from 183 patients, in the MN, BN1 and BN2 cohorts, respectively. Significant preoperative findings were greater proportion of patients with prior surgery (p=0.01) and tumors with parasellar extension (p=0.02) in the binostril (BN1&2) than the MN group. Substantially shorter operative time and less amount of blood loss were evident as our technique had evolved (p<0.001). Despite higher incidence, and more advanced grades, of cerebrospinal fluid leakage in the binostril groups (p < 0.001), the requirement for post-ETSS surgical repair was less than the mononostril cohort (p=0.04). At six-month follow-up (n=214), quantitative radiographic outcome analysis was markedly superior in BN2. Consequently, long-term result was better in this latest technical group. Important negative risk factors, from multivariate Cox regression analysis, were prior surgery, Knosp grade, and firm tumor while BN1, BN2 and percentages of anteroposterior dimension PA removal had positive effect on longer survival.ConclusionThe evolution of technique for ETSS for PA from MN to BN2 has shown its efficacy by improving intra- and postoperative outcomes in our study cohorts. Based on our results, not only that a neurosurgeon, wishing to start performing ETSS, should enroll in a formal fellowship training but he/she should also utilize advanced endoscopic tools, as we have proved its superior results in dealing with PA.

Surgery for tethered spinal cord caused by thickened filum terminale (FT) is frequently performed through S1 laminectomy based on the assumption that the internal FT (FTi) fuses with dura mater at S2 vertebral level. Literature on specific study for the site of its fusion and dural sac (DS) termination was rather limited. Moreover, there is no large anatomical study in Asian population. To determine the anatomy, examination of the FTi fusion site, as well as the region at which DS ended, was undertaken. From 80 embalmed cadavers, the majority of FTi fusion occurred at, or below, S1/S2 disk space (62.5%) which was less frequent than previous reports (70%-90%). In addition, there was 11.3% of the fila that fused above S1. Regarding the DS termination, it was found at, or below, S1/S2 disk space in 76.3% with one subject (1.3%) at L5/S1 disk space. With modest differences compared with non-Asian cadaveric data, our results offer pertinent information to surgeons performing tethered cord release. One ought to keep in mind that small, but not negligible, percentage of FTi can fuse with dura mater above S1 level; hence, more rostral laminectomy at L5 may be required. Clin. Anat. 33:558-561, 2020.