Oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) was pretreated using white-rot fungus Pleurotus
floridanus, phosphoric acid or their combination, and the results were evaluated based on the biomass components, and its structural and morphological changes. The carbohydrate losses after fungal, phosphoric acid, and fungal followed by phosphoric acid pretreatments were 7.89%, 35.65%, and 33.77%, respectively. The pretreatments changed the hydrogen bonds of cellulose and linkages between lignin and carbohydrate, which is associated with crystallinity of cellulose of OPEFB. Lateral Order Index (LOI) of OPEFB with no pretreatment, with fungal, phosphoric acid, and fungal followed by phosphoric acid pretreatments were 2.77, 1.42, 0.67, and 0.60, respectively. Phosphoric acid pretreatment showed morphological changes of OPEFB, indicated by the damage of fibre structure into smaller particle size. The fungal-, phosphoric acid-, and fungal followed by phosphoric acid pretreatments have improved the digestibility of OPEFB’s cellulose by 4, 6.3, and 7.4 folds, respectively.
Lignocellulosic carbohydrates, i.e. cellulose and hemicellulose, have abundant potential as feedstock for production of biofuels and chemicals. However, these carbohydrates are generally infiltrated by lignin. Breakdown of the lignin barrier will alter lignocelluloses structures and make the carbohydrates accessible for more efficient bioconversion. White-rot fungi produce ligninolytic enzymes (lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase, and laccase) and efficiently mineralise lignin into CO2 and H2O. Biological pretreatment of lignocelluloses using white-rot fungi has been used for decades for ruminant feed, enzymatic hydrolysis, and biopulping. Application of white-rot fungi capabilities can offer environmentally friendly processes for utilising lignocelluloses over physical or chemical pretreatment. This paper reviews white-rot fungi, ligninolytic enzymes, the effect of biological pretreatment on biomass characteristics, and factors affecting biological pretreatment. Application of biological pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis, biofuels (bioethanol, biogas and pyrolysis), biopulping, biobleaching, animal feed, and enzymes production are also discussed.
A packed bed reactor was evaluated for hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) removal by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria attached as a biofilm on salak fruit seeds (SFS). The bacteria were isolated from the sludge of the wastewater of a biogas plant. The promising isolate from the previous work was used in a biofilter, and its capacity to remove H 2 S was evaluated at effects of time of operation, effects of biogas flow rate, effects of axial distance, and packing material. Obtained results showed that isolate attached to SFS in an 80 cm height and 8 cm inside diameter biofilter column could decrease H 2 S in biogas from 142.48 ppm to 4.06 ppm (97.15% removal efficiency) for a biogas flow rate of 8550 g m À3 h À1 corresponding to a residence time of 4 h. Simple kinetic models of sulfide removal and bacterial growth was proposed to describe the operation of the biofilter. The radial H 2 S concentration gradient in the flowing gas is to be neglected so is the H 2 S concentration in the biofilm at certain axial distance. Meanwhile, the rate of H 2 S degradation was approximated by Monod type equation. The obtained simultaneous ordinary differential equations solved by Runge-Kutta method. Comparing the calculated results and the experimental data, it can be concluded that model proposed can sufficiently describe the performance of the H 2 S removal. The suitable values of the parameters are as follows: m max = 0.0000007 (s À1), K S = 0.0000039 (g cm À3), k G = 0.0086 (cm s À1), H S = 0.9 ((g cm À3)/ (g cm À3)), and Y x/s = 10.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.