Management of glycemic levels in the perioperative setting is critical, especially in diabetic patients. The effects of surgical stress and anesthesia have unique effects on blood glucose levels, which should be taken into consideration to maintain optimum glycemic control. Each stage of surgery presents unique challenges in keeping glucose levels within target range. Additionally, there are special operative conditions that require distinctive glucose management protocols. Interestingly, the literature still does not report a consensus perioperative glucose management strategy for diabetic patients. We hope to outline the most important factors required in formulating a perioperative diabetic regimen, while still allowing for specific adjustments using prudent clinical judgment. Overall, through careful glycemic management in perioperative patients, we may reduce morbidity and mortality and improve surgical outcomes.

No abstract

No abstract

The role of anti-hyperlipidemic therapy remains of key importance in the treatment of atherosclerotic disease. Moreover, given an already exaggerated predisposition for vascular disease at baseline, there is a preponderance of data that show management of hyperlipidemia is especially important in patients with chronic kidney disease. This is a concise, up-to-date review of lipid physiology, alterations in lipid concentrations with progressive renal failure, and currently available and emerging hyperlipidemic treatment options. Specifically, the roles of these therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease are reviewed.

Aims Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is frequent in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and portends detrimental prognosis. Despite interventions addressing the mitral valve (MV) have been proven effective to improve survival, an important knowledge gap exists regarding the role of medical therapy (MT) in this context. Thus, we aimed at investigating the role of MT optimization in patients with SMR and HFrEF. Methods and results A total of 435 patients with SMR and HFrEF were retrospectively evaluated. Of those, 158 with severe SMR were finally included, with 63 (40%) managed with MT alone and 96 (60%) with MV intervention plus MT. Echocardiography was performed after 30 days of MT optimization or MV intervention. Responders were patients with a final mitral regurgitation (MR) grade of ≤2+. Survival data were gathered through the National Database Index and patient chart review. MR severity improved in 131 patients (100% MV intervention; 57% MT) but stayed the same or worsened in 27 patients. Responders and non‐responders were similar for baseline characteristics. Overall, long‐term survival of responders was significantly higher than non‐responders [hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.32–0.96), P = 0.032]. No difference in survival was observed when evaluated by intervention type in the overall population (MT alone, n = 63; MV intervention plus MT, n = 95) [HR 0.77, 95% CI (0.48–1.26), P = 0.3], nor within responder group (MT alone, n = 36; MV intervention plus MT, n = 95) [HR 1.03, 95% CI (0.56–1.89), P = 0.94]. Conclusions MT reduces SMR severity in 57% of the patients with severe SMR. A final SMR grade of ≤2+ is linked to improved survival, independently of the type of treatment they receive.