The collection of PBSC for transplantation requires repetitive leukapheresis, typically via central venous catheters (CVC). To assess the complications of this procedure, we reviewed 75 consecutive PBSC transplant candidates requiring 554 leukapheresis on a Haemonetics V50 Plus apheresis system. CVC occlusion necessitating thrombolytic therapy or cancellation of the procedure was the most commonly observed complication, occurring among 37 patients on 86 occasions (15.9% of CVC-aided collections). Thrombolytic therapy was successful in 85%. Of the patients, 16% experienced an infectious complication during the PBSC harvesting; chemotherapy mobilization significantly increased this risk, whereas growth factor mobilization was protective (p < 0.02). Hematologic complications including anemia (median postapheresis nadir hemoglobin 8.8 g/dl) and transient thrombocytopenia (median postapheresis nadir 64,000/microliters) required transfusional support among 30.7% and 14.7% of patients, respectively. The use of chemotherapy mobilization was correlated with increased need for support of both red cells and platelets (p < 0.001). Additional complications included catheter placement problems, symptomatic citrate-related hypocalcemia, transient hypotension, and machine-related malfunctions. Although the complications of the PBSC harvests were manageable, given their frequency the decision to pursue this form of hematopoietic rescue in preference to traditional operative bone marrow harvesting must address these risks.
Summary:Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP; photopheresis), an immunomodulatory therapy, has previously demonstrated promising results in treating chronic graftversus-host disease (cGvHD). We treated six patients (ages 33-54 years) with long-standing refractory extensive-stage cGvHD. ECP was performed thrice weekly initially in all patients. Concomitant therapies included prednisone (n ¼ 6), tacrolimus (n ¼ 5), cyclosporin A (n ¼ 2), hydroxychloroquine (n ¼ 2), mycophenolate mofetil (n ¼ 1), and psoralen plus ultraviolet A radiation (n ¼ 1). After an average of 7.2 months (range, 2-13 months) of ECP, all patients experienced either improvement or stabilization in sclerodermatous skin changes, as well as partial improvements in liver enzyme levels. Skin softening occurred in four patients and was noted as early as 3-8 weeks into treatment. Two patients were able to taper steroid therapy, and two patients were able to taper ECP to twice weekly. ECP was well tolerated. Our results support those of previous studies, suggesting that ECP may be beneficial in patients with refractory cGvHD.
Summary:To reduce the number of apheresis procedures and maintain the usual rate of hematopoietic recovery in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy, we studied the effect of adding a small volume of ex vivo expanded bone marrow to low doses of CD34 + blood stem cells. Thirty-four patients with breast cancer received G-CSF (10 g/kg/day) priming followed by a limited volume (50-100 ml) bone marrow aspiration and standard 10-liter aphereses. Marrow was expanded ex vivo using the AastromReplicell system and infused along with low doses of blood-derived CD34 + cells, collected in one apheresis. Thirty-one evaluable patients received a median CD34 + blood stem cell dose of 0.7 × 10 6 /kg (range, 0.2-2.5) and 4.7 × 10 7 nucleated cells/kg (range, 1.98-8.7) of ex vivo expanded marrow. All patients recovered with normal blood counts and engrafted 500 neutrophils/l and 20 000 platelets/l in a median of 10 and 13 days, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that, in addition to CD34 + lineage negative cell quantity, the quantity of stromal progenitors contained in the ex vivo expanded product correlated with engraftment outcome (r = 0.551, P = 0.004
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.