Introduction: Displaced fractures of mid third clavicle are common in young athletic population and choice of management is still controversial. Recent studies have shown that these fractures do not have favourable outcomes with non-operative management and nonunion rates could be as high as 20%, in addition, there is symptomatic malunion with shortening. Objective: To compare the results of the operative versus that of conservative treatment for the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Materials and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in Orthopaedic and Trauma center, CMH, Dhaka, from the period of January 2014 to December 2016 to compare results of open reduction and internal fixation by plating with that of conservative management. Total 60 patients (30 in each group) were analyzed in terms of fracture union and functional outcome. Patients in the non-operative group were managed by triangular sling with or without strapping whereas in the operative group fractures were reduced and fixed with a contoured reconstruction plate. Patients were actively followed up for 12 months and functional outcome was measured by Rowe and Oxford shoulder scoring system. Complications were monitored clinically and radiologically. Results: All fractures in the operated group united compared with thirteen cases of symptomatic malunion (43.33%) in the non-operated group which is statistically significant. Rowe and Oxford scores was significantly higher in the operated group than the non-operated group in every occasion of follow-up. There was no major complication of surgery. In one patient (3.33%) plate had to be removed for hardware irritation and prominence. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal plate fixation in acute displaced midshaft clavicular fractures resulted in improved outcome decreased rate of non-union and symptomatic mal-union compared with non-operative treatment Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.13(1) 2017: 81-85
Introduction: Health problems of elderly are an emerging health burden throughout the world. Bangladesh is currently undergoing a demographic transition and the proportion of the population of 60 years and older is increasing rapidly. Health care providers and policymakers are highly concerned with this burning issue. Objective: To know the disease pattern among the elderly patients in Combined Military Hospital, Dhaka. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out from July 2015 to June 2016 among 152 elderly patients above 60 years of age admitted in Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Dhaka Cantonment. Data were collected by face-to-face interview with semi-structured questionnaire and checklist following purposive sampling technique. Analysis of data was done by Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 20.0). Results: Mean age of the elderly was 72.06±4.56 years with the range of 60-80 years and majority (90.8%) of the elderly was male. Out of total 152 elderly patients, by occupation majority (31.6%) were in the business group followed by 30.3% in the retired group and 9.2 % in the housewife group. Average monthly family income was BDT 17927.63±7360.75 with the range of BDT 6000-35000. With initial complaints elderly patients reported to doctors in private chamber (38.2%), private hospital (25.6%) and Govt hospital (5.9%). Among all of the elderly patients, majority (21.1%) had Diabetes Mellitus followed by Rheumatoid Arthritis (17.6%), Asthma (12.5%), Cataract (11.2%), ENT problem (6.6%), Malignancy (5.9%) and Benign Enlargement of Prostate 8(5.3%). Conclusion: The number of elderly people is expanding rapidly; it also presents multifaceted health problems and thus creates unique challenges for the national healthcareservices. Early identification of problem and ensuring the availability of health with economic and social support can have a control over the elderly health problems. Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.13(1) 2017: 8-12
Introduction: In gastric cancer surgery, gastrojejunostomy is one of the most important procedures. Anastomosis between different parts of the stomach and the intestine is a basic technical component in all gastrointestinal procedure. Backgrounds and aims: This study evaluated complications of gastrojejunostomy in gastric cancer surgery with two methods: singlelayer and double-layer anastomosis. Materials and methods: This study was carried out in the department of surgery in Mymensingh Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012. 100 patients with carcinoma stomach who needed gastrojejunostomy were included in this study. These patients with average age of 43.22 years were divided in two groups (50 in each group); single-layer and double-layer anastomosis. In single-layer anastomosis gastrojejunostomy was performed in interrupted method with absorbable suture (2/0 vicryl). Double-layer anastomosis was carried out with continuous suture (2/0 silk, 2/0 catgut). Possible post-operative complications like anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, abdominal sepsis, anastomotic stenosis and wound infection were evaluated. Results: In the single-layer group, 4 patients (8%) developed anastomotic leakage, wound infection and only 2 patients (4%) developed abdominal sepsis, pelvic abscess and anastomotic bleeding. No patient developed anastomotic stricture. In double-layer group, 2 (4%) patients developed anastomotic leakage, only 1 (2%) patient had pelvic abscess, abdominal sepsis and anastomotic bleeding but wound infection in 2 (4%) patients. Conclusion: Gastrojejunostomy with single-layer hand-sewn suture technique is safe without serious complications in comparison to double-layer suture technique. More-over operation time is less and cost is less in single-layer method.
not available DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/pulse.v6i1-2.20361 Pulse Vol.6 January-December 2013 p.79-83
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.