In countries with centralized educational systems national tests are used as primary devices through which changes in the educational system are introduced. This article examines the impact over time of two national tests which have been in operation for a number of years: one in Arabic as a second language (ASL) and one in English as a foreign language (EFL) through questionnaires, interviews and document analysis from a sample of teachers, students and language inspectors. Results showed different washback patterns for the two tests. Slight modifications in the ASL test created no effect in classroom activities, test preparation, or the status and prestige of the subject tested, yet, the inspectors expressed satisfaction and wished to continue the administration of the test as they feared that without the tests proficiency levels would drop. Slight modifications in the EFL test, on the other hand, created major impact in terms of teaching activities, time devoted for test preparation, production of new teaching material, etc. Although negative attitudes were expressed by teachers regarding the quality of the test, they would like it to continue. Inspectors believe that the test creates a meaningful change and is powerful enough to trigger changes without a need to provide training and a new curriculum. The study shows that washback varies over time, owing to many factors such as the status of the language and the uses of the test.
The study investigated whether changes in the educational context of teaching Arabic as a second language in Israeli schools affect students' attitudes towards the language, its speakers and culture, and motivation to study the language. These changes included teaching spoken Arabic rather than Modern Standard Arabic and lowering the starting age of instruction. Self-report questionnaires were distributed to 692 students (4th-6th grade) and 362 parents from 14 elementary schools. The findings revealed that students who study spoken Arabic (experimental group), as opposed to those who do not (control group), report holding more positive attitudes towards the Arabic language, its culture, and speakers, and also claim to be more motivated to study the language. Findings also confirm the important role that parents have over their children's behavior because parents' attitudes constituted one of the predictors of students' motivation to study Arabic. Yet, the variable that best predicted students' motivation was their satisfaction with their Arabic study program.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.