PurposeMany strokes are not recognized by emergency medical services (EMS) providers and many providers do not prenotify emergency departments (EDs) of incoming stroke patients. The objectives of this project were to survey EMS providers to (1) assess knowledge of prehospital care related to stroke identification, time window for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) administration, and comprehensive stroke centers in our health system, (2) gain insight from EMS providers regarding barriers to providing prenotification, information they provide for a prenotification, and optimal methods of providing feedback, and (3) provide EMS providers with stroke care and management information.MethodsA survey was administered to EMS providers at four hospital EDs. The survey included questions related to knowledge of prehospital stroke care and barriers to providing prenotification. EMS providers were also provided a one-page flyer with information related to prehospital stroke care. Descriptive statistics were used to describe results.ResultsOf 301 EMS providers surveyed, 96.0% report that they use the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale to identify stroke, and 11.0% correctly identified the time window for IV tPA administration for acute ischemic stroke as within 4.5 hrs from the last known well time. The majority (82.7%) correctly identified the comprehensive stroke center in our health system. Barriers to providing prenotification included short transport time (40.5%), information being lost in dispatch (39.5%), and not having direct communication with ED staff (30.2%). Most reported wanting to receive feedback on the stroke patients they transported (93.7%), and 49.5% reported that the optimal method of providing feedback is via a mobile application.ConclusionDeficits in stroke care knowledge among EMS providers were identified. Short transport time, inability to communicate with ED staff, and information lost in dispatch were cited as barriers to providing prenotification. Most EMS providers desire real-time feedback regarding patients via a mobile application.

No abstract

Introduction: It has been estimated that more than 30% of all stroke cases are still missed by prehospital stroke scales and 50% or more of cases identified as stroke have been false positives. There may exist opportunities to improve the quality of prehospital stroke care by providing one-on one EMS education. The objective of this project was to provide EMS providers with one-on-one education and survey their stroke care knowledge, identify barriers to providing prenotification, and ask them about the optimal method of providing feedback. Methods: Summer students staffed four hospital emergency departments in our health system and administered a quality improvement educational survey to EMS providers over a three-month period. The survey included questions related to knowledge of prehospital stroke care and barriers to providing prenotification. Descriptive statistics were used to describe results. Results: Surveys from 301 EMS providers were analyzed. Only 33% correctly identified the time window for IV tPA administration for AIS as within 4.5 hours from the last known well time. The majority of EMS providers (83%) correctly identified the comprehensive stroke center in our health system. EMS providers reported barriers to providing prenotification, including short transport time (41%), information being lost in dispatch (40%), and not having direct communication with hospital staff (30%). Most EMS providers reported wanting to receive feedback on the stroke patients they transported (94%), and 50% reported that the optimal method of providing feedback is via a mobile application. Conclusions: Addressing deficits in prehospital stroke care knowledge among EMS providers and their barriers to providing prehospital notification are key steps to improving prehospital stroke care, and ultimately, patient outcomes. Most EMS providers desire real-time feedback via a mobile application.