New synergic behavior is always inspiring scientists toward the formation of nanocomposites aiming at getting advanced materials with superior performance and/or novel properties. Carbon nanotubes (CNT), graphene, fullerene, and graphite as carbon-based are great fillers for polymeric materials. The presence of these materials in the polymeric matrix would render it several characteristics, such as electrical and thermal conductivity, magnetic, mechanical, and as sensor materials for pressure and other environmental changes. This review presents the most recent works in the use of CNT, graphene, fullerene, and graphite as filler in different polymeric matrixes. The primary emphasis of this review is on CNT preparation and its composites formation, while others carbon-based nano-fillers are also introduced. The methods of making polymer nanocomposites using these fillers and their impact on the properties obtained are also presented and discussed.

Ternary nanocomposites (NCs) containing copper oxide (CuO)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/various carbon‐based nanofillers have been successfully prepared as thin films by an ex situ method as a selective Hg+2 sensor. The structural, morphological, and electrochemical properties of the NCs were identified by all common characterization tools. The FT‐IR curves of these NCs proved the efficiency of CuO mixed with single‐walled CNTs (CuO/SWCNTs), multi‐walled CNTs (CuO/MWCNTs), or graphene (CuO/G) nanoparticles in the PMMA polymer matrix. The mixed nanofillers significantly improved the properties of the PMMA film. The thermal characteristics of the pure PMMA polymer matrix were highly developed by adding nanofillers in the form of NCs. The maximum composite degradation temperature (CDTmax) values were comparable for all the NCs and were in the range of 345 to 406°C. For fabrication, the CuO‐PMMA‐SWCNT, CuO‐PMMA‐MWCNT, and CuO‐PMMA‐GNCs were coated onto a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) to form a tiny layer with orderly thickness using a conductive 5% Nafion chemical binder. During the electrochemical investigation, it was found that CuO‐PMMA‐SWCNT had the maximum response toward Hg2+ ions compared to the other nanofillers in a buffer medium (phosphate type). To calibrate the Hg2+ ionic sensor, the data were plotted against Hg2+ ion concentration and the proposed sensor showed linearity over a wide range of concentrations (0.1‐0.01 mM), which is called the linear dynamic range (LDR). The analytical parameters, such as sensitivity (1.70 × 102 μAμM‐1 cm−2), detection limit (55.76 ± 2.79 pM), and limit of quantification (185.87 pM) were calculated from the calibration curve. Moreover, it showed good reproducibility, fast response time, good linearity, large LDR, and good stability. The CuO‐PMMA‐SWCNT NC‐modified GCE offers a new route to fabricate novel heavy metal ionic sensors, which might be used in green environment and health development applications.