Biodiversity may increase ecosystem resilience. However, we have limited
understanding if this holds true for ecosystems that respond to gradual
environmental change with abrupt shifts to an alternative state. Here we
modelled the interactions of three groups of bacteria that mediate
anoxic-oxic regime shifts, and explored how trait diversity influences
resilience. We found that diversity did not always increase resilience:
greater diversity in two of the groups increased but in one group
decreased resilience of their preferred ecosystem state. We also found
that simultaneous diversity in multiple groups often led to smaller
effects than diversity in only one group. Overall, our results suggest
that higher diversity can increase resilience but can also promote
collapse when diversity occurs in a functional group that negatively
influences the state it occurs in. We propose this mechanism as a
potential management approach to facilitate the recovery of a desired
ecosystem state.
Plants live in close association with microbial organisms that inhabit the environment in which they grow. Much recent work has aimed to characterise these plant-microbiome interactions, identifying those associations that increase growth. Although most work has focused on terrestrial plants, Lemna minor, a floating aquatic angiosperm, is increasingly used as a model in host-microbe interactions and many bacterial associations have been shown to play an important role in supporting plant fitness. However, the ubiquity and stability of these interactions as well as their dependence on specific abiotic environmental conditions remain unclear. Here we assess the impact of a full L. minor microbiome on plant fitness and phenotype by assaying plants from eight natural sites, with and without their microbiomes, over a range of abiotic environmental conditions. We find that the microbiome systematically supressed plant fitness, although the magnitude of this effect varied among plant genotypes and depended on the abiotic environment. Presence of the microbiome also resulted in phenotypic changes, with plants forming smaller colonies and producing smaller fronds and shorter roots. Differences in phenotype among plant genotypes were reduced when the microbiome was removed, as were genotype by environment interactions, suggesting that the microbiome plays a role in mediating the plant phenotypic response to the environment.
Duckweeds (Lemnaceae) are increasingly studied for their potential for
phytoremediation of heavy-metal polluted water bodies. A prerequisite
for metal removal, however, is the tolerance of the organism to the
pollutant, e.g., the metal zinc (Zn). Duckweeds have been shown to
differ in their tolerances to Zn, however, despite them most commonly
co-occurring with other species, there is a lack of research concerning
the effect of species interactions on Zn tolerance. Here we tested
whether the presence of a second species influenced the growth rate of
the three duckweed species Lemna minor, Lemna gibba, and Lemna
turionifera. We used four different Zn concentrations in a replicated
microcosm experiment under sterile conditions, either growing the
species in isolation or in a 2-species mixture. The response to Zn
differed between species, but all three species showed a high tolerance
to Zn, with low levels of Zn even increasing the growth rates. The
growth rates of the individual species were influenced by the identity
of the competing species, but this was independent of the Zn
concentration. Our results suggest that species interactions should be
considered in future research with duckweeds and that several duckweed
species have high tolerance to metal pollution, making them candidates
for phytoremediation efforts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.