Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

No abstract

189 Background: Despite improvements of postoperative adjuvant therapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its prognosis remains poor. A randomized controlled trial has begun to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine and S1 (NAC-GS) with upfront surgery (Up-S) for patients with PDAC planned resection. Methods: Patients were enrolled after the diagnosis of resectable PDAC with histological confirmation. They were randomly assigned as either NAC-GS or Up-S. In NAC-GS, gemcitabine was provided at a dose of 1 g/m2 on day 1 and 8 and oral S-1 was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2 twice daily on 1-14 days. Patients received 2 cycles of this regimen. S-1 adjuvant for 6 months was administered for the patients with curative resection and fully recovered within 10 weeks after surgery in both arms. The primary endpoint for the phase III part was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included adverse events, resection rate, recurrence-free survival, residual tumor status, nodal metastases, and tumor marker kinetics. The target sample size required 163 patients (α-error 0.05; power 0.8) in each arm. The trial was conducted by the Health Labor Sciences Research Grant (H22-009) of Japan and registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000009634. Results: From January 2013 to January 2016, 364 patients were enrolled in 57 centers (182 to NAC-GS and 182 to Up-S). Of these, two were excluded because of ineligibility, therefore 182 patients in NAC-GS and 180 in Up-S constituted the ITT analysis-set. The median OS was 36.7 months in NAC-GS and 26.6 months in Up-S; HR 0.72 (95% confidential interval 0.55-0.94; p=0.015 [stratified log-rank test]). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events frequently (72.8%) observed in NAC-GS were leukopenia or neutropenia. However, the resection rate, R0 resection rate, and morbidity of the operation were equivalent in the two groups. There was no perioperative mortality in either group. Conclusions: This phase III study demonstrated the significant survival benefits of NAC-GS treatment. Therefore, the results indicated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be a new standard for patients with resectable PDAC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009634.

The four predictive risk factors identified here can provide useful information useful for tailoring postoperative management of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C).

Purpose A multicenter survey was conducted to explore the role of adjuvant surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer with a long-term favorable response to nonsurgical cancer treatments. Methods Clinical data including overall survival were retrospectively compared between 58 initially unresectable pancreatic cancer patients who underwent adjuvant surgery with a favorable response to non-surgical cancer treatments over 6 months after the initial treatment and 101 patients who did not undergo adjuvant surgery because of either unchanged unresectability, a poor performance status, and/ or the patients' or surgeons' wishes. Results Overall mortality and morbidity were 1.7 and 47 % in the adjuvant surgery group. The survival curve in the adjuvant surgery group was significantly better than in the control group (p \ 0.0001). The propensity score analysis revealed that adjuvant surgery was a significant Sci (2013) 20:590-600 DOI 10.1007 independent prognostic variable with an adjusted hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval) of 0.569 (0.36-0.89). Subgroup analysis according to the time from initial treatment to surgical resection showed a significant favorable difference in the overall survival in patients who underwent adjuvant surgery over 240 days after the initial treatment. Conclusion Adjuvant surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer patients can be a safe and effective treatment. The overall survival rate from the initial treatment is extremely high, especially in patients who received non-surgical anti-cancer treatment for more than 240 days.