No abstract

The present study evaluated the bioavailability and bioequivalence of fixed dose combination test formulation (atorvastatin 10 mg and aspirin 150 mg capsule) against marketed reference formulations (Lipitor® tablets 10 mg and Nu-Seals tablets 75 mg). This study was an open label, balanced, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, single dose, crossover trial in 80 healthy adult human volunteers under fasting conditions. Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin, aspirin and salicylic acid were quantified using LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental model and mean pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between test and reference formulations. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Cmax /AUC0-t and Cmax/AUC0-∞) for atorvastatin test and reference formulations were (52.69 ng.h/mL, 55.64 ng.h/mL, 9.45 ng/mL, 0.18 1/h and 0.17 1/h) and (52.20 ng.h/mL, 55.38 ng.h/mL, 10.25 ng/mL, 0.20 1/h and 0.19 1/h) respectively; and for aspirin were (1 378.62 ng.h/mL, 1 383.90 ng.h/mL, 1 022.18 ng/mL, 0.75 1/h and 0.75 1/h) and (1 314.17 ng.h/mL, 1 314.50 ng.h/mL, 985.90 ng/mL, 0.75 1/h and 0.75 1/h) respectively. Where as for salicylic acid, above parameters were (42 357.57 ng.h/mL, 44 139.47 ng.h/mL, 9 820.15 ng/mL, 0.24 1/h and 0.23 1/h) and (40 217.08 ng.h/mL, 42 032.44 ng.h/mL, 9 569.18 ng/mL, 0.24 1/h and 0.24 1/h) respectively for test and reference formulations. The 90% confidence intervals of atorvastatin and salicylic acid for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Cmax /AUC0-t and Cmax/AUC0-∞ parameters were found to be within the acceptable regulatory bioequivalence limits. In conclusion, the new fixed dose combination test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference formulations under fasting conditions.

An open-label, 2-treatment, 3-sequence, 3-period, single-dose, partial replicate crossover studies under fasting (n=48), fed (n=60) and fasting-applesauce (n=48) (sprinkled on one table spoonful of applesauce) modalities were conducted in healthy adult male volunteers to evaluate bioequivalence between 2 formulations of lansoprazole delayed release capsules 30 mg. In all the 3 studies, as per randomization, either test or reference formulations were administered in a crossover manner with a required washout period of at least 7 days. Blood samples were collected adequately (0-24 h) to determine lansoprazole plasma concentrations using a validated LC-MS/MS analytical method. To characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Tmax, Kel and T1/2) of lansoprazole, non-compartmental analysis and ANOVA was applied on ln-transformed values. The bioequivalence was tested based on within-subject variability of the reference formulation. In fasting and fed studies (within-subject variability>30%) bioequivalence was evaluated with scaled average bioequivalence, hence for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, the 95% upper confidence bound for (μT-μR)2-θσ2 WR was ≤0, and the point estimates (test-to-reference ratio) were within the regulatory acceptance limit 80.00-125.00%. In fasting-applesauce study (within-subject variability<30%) bioequivalence was evaluated with average bioequivalence, the 90% CI of ln-transformed data of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the regulatory acceptance limit 80.00-125.00%. Based on these aforesaid statistical inferences, it was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to reference formulation.

To assess the bioequivalence of two extended-release tablets of donepezil 23 mg, open label, randomized, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period crossover studies under fasting (n=74) and fed (n=94) conditions in healthy adult human volunteers were conducted. Subjects were randomized to either of the two treatment arms (test or reference) separated by a washout period of 28 days. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h post-dose and plasma samples were analyzed for donepezil using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using a non-compartmental approach. Bioequivalence was evaluated in 69 subjects in the fasting study, and 71 subjects in the fed study. In the fasting study, the 90% CI of Cmax and AUC0-72 were 82.50–90.10 and 92.38–98.60, respectively. Corresponding values in the fed study were 91.82–98.05 and 97.27–100.27. Based on the results, the test product (donepezil) met the US regulatory criteria of bioequivalence relative to the reference product (Aricept®) under both fasting and fed conditions.

No abstract