Background: Ki-67 expression has been established as a predictive marker for recurrence in breast cancer. The insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) is a transmembrane heterotetrameric protein implicated in promoting the oncogenic transformation, growth and survival of cancer cells. However, no useful data are presently available regarding the biological significance of both molecules in lung cancer. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the expression of Ki-67 and IGF1R. This is the first molecular analysis of the correlation between the expression of Ki-67 and IGF1R in a Japanese population of primary lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: Tumor specimens were collected from 183 consecutive patients who underwent a complete resection for lung adenocarcinoma from 2003 to 2007 in our department. We analyzed the Ki-67 and IGF1R expression levels in the primary lung adenocarcinomas by immunohistochemistry. Results: The positive expression of Ki-67 and IGF1R was identified in 41 (22.4%) and 43 (23.6%) patients, respectively. The positive expression of Ki-67 was identified in 14 (50.0%) of 28 patients and 27 (18.1%) of 155 patients with and without recurrence, respectively (p< 0.001). The positive expression of Ki-67 was associated with a poorer disease-free survival (DFS) according to the survival analysis. A multivariate analysis also demonstrated that Ki-67 expression was independently associated with an increased risk of a poor DFS. On the other hand, a significant relationship was also observed between the expression levels of Ki-67 and IGF1R in NSCLC. However, in the subgroup analysis, no significant correlation was not observed. Conclusions: The expression of Ki-67, but not IGF1R, may be a useful marker for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with the primary lung adenocarcinoma following complete resection.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1149. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1149
Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been established as one of standard therapy, the prognostic factors of ICIs remain unclear, aside from the programed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of tumor cells. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors of ICIs. Methods: We analyzed the clinicopathological data of 44 cases of advanced NSCLC targeted with ICIs in our hospital, between February 2016 and February 2018, in order to determine the prognostic factors of ICIs. We also reviewed the literature regarding ICIs. Result: We retrospectively analyzed the 44 cases (26 nivolumab and 18 pembrolizumab cases). These patients were 38 men and 6 women, comprising 13 cases of adenocarcinoma, 29 squamous cell carcinoma and 2 unclassified types. Seven patients were using first-line therapy and while the others were using secondline therapy or later. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations were negative in all the cases. The response rate and disease control rate were 20.5% and 51.3%, respectively. The median progression-free survival time and median survival time were 146 days and 257 days, respectively. We observed five severe adverse effects (AEs) (three cases of interstitial pneumonia, one of liver dysfunction and one of adrenal failure), that were resolved by steroid pulse therapy. In multivariate analyses, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), pathological type, standardized uptake value (SUV) on positron emission tomography (PET), white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin were independently prognostic factors. There were no significant differences in the prognosis between nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Conclusions: ICIs were effective in 44 treated NSCLC cases. Our analysis suggests that while ICIs are effective in treating patients, candidates must be carefully selected and cautiously observed.
A lobectomy with a resection of the pulmonary artery is less invasive than a pneumonectomy. However, it seems to be extremely difficult to perform this technique using video-assisted thoracic surgery with technical limitations because this technique is associated with an increased operative risk even in an open thoracotomy. Between April 2002 and December 2006, a curative video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy including a mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 121 patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer. Five of those patients underwent a thoracoscopic lobectomy with the partial removal and reconstruction of the pulmonary artery. The causes of the pulmonary artery resection included two direct invasions of the artery, two invasions of the arterial branch, and one calcified lymphadenopathy involving the branch. No patients required a blood transfusion. No complications attributable to the technique or mortality were seen. No patients showed an abnormal blood flow through the reconstructed vessel. There were no local recurrences on the pulmonary artery. A video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy including a partial resection and reconstruction of the pulmonary artery is a complex procedure for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. It is feasible when all associated technical issues are properly addressed.
Early removal of chest tube on the day after thoracoscopic lobectomy, independently of the drainage volume, appears to be safe in well-selected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.