Objectives. Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is one of the myeloproliferative neoplasms characterized by a sustained elevation of platelet numbers with a tendency for thrombosis and hemorrhage. The aim of this work is to establish the relation between calreticulin, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR mutations in ET patients and the thrombotic risk of these patients. Methods. This study was carried out on 120 ET patients and 40 apparently healthy individuals as a control group. Results. There were increases in WBCs, PLT counts, PT, fibrinogen concentration factor V Leiden, and MTHFR mutation in ET patients as compared to the control group (P<0.05). Also, there were increases in WBCs, PLT counts, and hematocrit value in thrombosed ET patients as compared to the nonthrombosed ones (P<0.05). On the contrary, there was no significantly statistical difference in ET patients with JAK2 V617F positive mutation versus the JAK2 negative group (P>0.05) and in patients with cardiovascular risk factors versus patients with noncardiovascular risk factors (P>0.05). ET patients with factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene, and CALR mutations were more prone to thrombosis (odds ratio 5.6, 5.7 and 4.7, respectively). On the contrary, JAk2V 617F and MTHFR mutations have no effect on the thrombotic state of those patients. Conclusion. There is a significant increase risk of thrombosis in ET patients with CALR mutation, thrombophilic mutations, as well as factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation with a risk of developing leukemic transformation.
This study aimed to assess the prognostic influences of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) among Egyptian patients. Exon 7 of WT1 was screened for mutations in samples from 82 CN-AML patients out of 203 newly diagnosed AML patients, using a high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. Seven out of 82 AML patients (8.3 %) harbored WT1 mutations. There was no significant difference between the mutant WT1 and wild type AML patients as regard age, sex, French-AmericanBritish subtypes and the prevalence of success of induction remission therapy (P \ 0.5). AML patients with mutant WT1 had shorter overall survival as compared to those patients with wild WT1 (HR = 1.38; 95 % CI 4.79-6.86; P = 0.004). In conclusion, CN-AML patients with WT1 gene mutation have poor clinical outcome. We recommend testing the WT1 mutations as part of molecularly based risk assessment and risk-adapted treatment stratification of patients with CN-AML.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) among Egyptian patients.Materials and Methods: Exons 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 9 of WT1 were screened for mutations in samples from 82 CN-AML patients out of 203 newly diagnosed AML patients, of age ranging from 21 to 74 years, using high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. Results: Eleven patients out of 82 (13.41%) harbored WT1 mutations. Mutations were detected in exon 7 (n=7), exon 9 (n=2), exon 8 (n=1), and exon 3 (n=1), but not in exons 1 or 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the WT1 mutants and wild types as regards age, sex, French-American-British subtypes, and the prevalence of success of induction remission therapy (p=0.966; 28.6% vs. 29.3%). Patients with WT1 mutations had overall survival lower than patients with the wild type (HR=1.38; 95% CI 4.79-6.86; p=0.004). Conclusion: CN-AML patients with WT1 mutations have poor clinical outcome. We recommend molecular testing for WT1 mutations in patients with CN-AML at diagnosis in order to improve risk stratification of those patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.