Pegylated interferon-alpha (PegIFNα) therapy has limited effectiveness in hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, the mechanism underlying this failure is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the influence of bile acids (BAs), especially taurocholic acid (TCA), on the response to PegIFNα therapy in CHB patients. Here, we used mass spectrometry to determine serum BA profiles in 110 patients with chronic HBV infection and 20 healthy controls (HCs). We found that serum BAs, especially TCA, were significantly elevated in HBeAg-positive CHB patients compared with those in HCs and patients in other phases of chronic HBV infection. Moreover, serum BAs, particularly TCA, inhibited the response to PegIFNα therapy in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. Mechanistically, the expression levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, granzyme B, and perforin were measured using flow cytometry to assess the effector functions of immune cells in patients with low or high BA levels. We found that BAs reduced the number and proportion and impaired the effector functions of CD3+CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. TCA in particular reduced the frequency and impaired the effector functions of CD3+CD8+ T and NK cells in vitro and in vivo and inhibited the immunoregulatory activity of IFN-α in vitro. Thus, our results show that BAs, especially TCA, inhibit the response to PegIFNα therapy by impairing the effector functions of CD3+CD8+ T and NK cells in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. Our findings suggest that targeting TCA could be a promising approach for restoring IFN-α responsiveness during CHB treatment.

Pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) is a direct transcription product of hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), and it plays important roles in viral genome amplification and replication. This study was designed to investigate whether serum pgRNA is a strong alternative marker for reflecting HBV cccDNA levels and to analyze the correlation between serum pgRNA, serum HBV DNA, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). A total of 400 HBV-infected patients who received nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy with different clinical outcomes were involved in this research. Case groups included asymptomatic hepatitis B virus carrier (ASC), chronic hepatitis B (CHB), liver cirrhosis (LC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, with 100 patients in each group. The results showed that the levels of HBV pgRNA had significant differences between these 4 groups. Serum pgRNA levels correlated well with serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels (HBV pgRNA levels versus HBV DNA levels, r = 0.58, P < 0.001; HBV pgRNA levels versus HBsAg levels, r = 0.47, P < 0.001). In addition, we focused on the 108 HBV-infected patients with HBV DNA levels of <500 IU/ml; it was surprising to find that in 17.57% (13/74) of cases, HBV pgRNA could be detected even when the HBV DNA level was below 20 IU/ml. In conclusion, HBV pgRNA levels in serum can be a surrogate marker for intrahepatic HBV cccDNA compared with serum HBV DNA and HBsAg. The detection of serum HBV pgRNA levels may provide a reference for clinical monitoring of cccDNA levels and the selection of appropriate timing for discontinuing antiviral therapy, especially when HBV DNA levels are below the detection limit.

Mutations in hepatitis B virus (HBV) reverse transcriptase (RT) are associated with nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) resistance during long-term antiviral treatment. However, the characterization of mutations in HBV RT in untreated patients has not yet been well illustrated. The objective of this study was to investigate the characterization and clinical significance of natural variability in HBV RT in treatment-naive patients. HBV RT sequences were analyzed in 427 patients by Sanger sequencing and in 66 patients by next-generation sequencing. Primary or secondary NA resistance (NAr) mutations were not found, except A181T in RT (rtA181T) by Sanger sequencing, but they were detected by next-generation sequencing. Mutations were found in 56 RT amino acid (aa) sites by Sanger sequencing, 36 of which had mutations that could lead to changes in B or T cell epitopes in the RT or S protein. The distribution of mutations was diverse in different sections within the RT region. Multiple mutations showed significant association with HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, age, and severity of liver fibrosis. Mutations at rt251, rt266, rt274, rt280, rt283, rt284, and rt286 were found most in the advanced liver disease (ALD) group by next-generation sequencing. The present study demonstrates that next-generation sequencing (NGS) was more suitable than Sanger sequencing to monitor NAr mutations at a low rate in the treatment-naive patients, and that mutations in the RT region might be involved in the progression to ALD.

Background and Aims: The drug resistance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) originates from mutations within HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) region during the prolonged antiviral therapy. So far, the characteristics of how these mutations distribute and evolve in the process of therapy have not been clarified yet. Thus we aimed to investigate these characteristics and discuss their contributing factors. Methods: HBV RT region was direct-sequenced in 285 treatment-naive and 214 post-treatment patients. Mutational frequency and Shannon entropy were calculated to identify the specific mutations differing between genotypes or treatment status. A typical putative resistance mutation rtL229V was further studied using in-vitro susceptibility assays and molecular modeling. Results: The classical resistance mutations were rarely detected among treatment-naive individuals, while the putative resistance mutations were observed at 8 AA sites. rtV191I and rtA181T/V were the only resistance mutations identified as genotype-specific mutation. Selective pressure of drug usage not only contributed to the classical resistance mutations, but also induced the changes at a putative resistance mutation site rt229. rtL229V was the major substitution at the site of rt229. It contributed to the most potent suppression of viral replication and reduced the in-vitro drug susceptibility to entecavir (ETV) when coexisting with rtM204V, consistent with the hypothesis based on the molecular modeling and clinical data analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of mutations in RT region under the different circumstances of genotypes and therapy status might pave the way for a better understanding of resistance evolution, thus providing the basis for a rational administration of antiviral therapy.