Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play a significant role in the occurrence and progression of tumors. In different tumors, they can either act as an oncogene or tumor suppressor via modulating various target mRNAs. OIP5-AS1 belongs to lncRNA family. It has been reported to be involved in the tumorigenesis of some cancers, such as bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and multiple myeloma. However, the role it plays in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the inherent mechanism of lncRNA OIP5-AS1 in HCC. In the first place, qRT-PCR found that OIP5-AS1 and VEGFA expressions were significantly increased while miR-3163 was obviously reduced in HCC cells and tissues. Next, a series of functional experiments found that knockdown of OIP5-AS1 suppressed HCC cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis abilities while promoting cell apoptosis simultaneously. Last but not least, miR-3163 inhibition or VEGFA overexpression can reverse the antitumor effect of OIP5-AS1. In summary, OIP5-AS1 affects HCC proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis in HCC by regulating VEGFA expression through sponging miR-3163.
Background
TACE combined with targeted therapy is a method for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After adding Camrelizumab, some patients had gained benefits, but some patients have produced serious adverse reactions. Therefore, more studies are needed to prove the efficacy and adverse reactions, and prediction models are needed to help with decision-making.
Methods
With ethics committee approval, a bi-center retrospective study was finished. A total of 235 patients were enrolled and divided into the treatment group of camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib and the treatment group of TACE and sorafenib. The survival rate, short-term efficacy and adverse reactions were compared, and the efficacy prediction model was established.
Results
The 2-year survival time and objective response rate of the treatment group of camrelizumab combined with TACE plus sorafenib were higher than those of TACE plus sorafenib. Camrelizumab increased the proportion of reactive capillary proliferation, but had no effect on other adverse reactions. The established nomogram can accurately predict the response to the treatment.
Conclusions
Camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib can improve the survival rate of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and it is an effective treatment. The Nomogram model can predict the efficacy, which is beneficial for patients.
Background TACE combined with targeted therapy is a method for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After adding Camrelizumab, some patients had gained bene ts, but some patients have produced serious adverse reactions. Therefore, more studies are needed to prove the e cacy and adverse reactions, and prediction models are needed to help with decision-making.
MethodsWith ethics committee approval, a bi-center retrospective study was nished. A total of 235 patients were enrolled and divided into the treatment group of camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib and the treatment group of TACE and sorafenib. The survival rate, short-term e cacy and adverse reactions were compared, and the e cacy prediction model was established.
ResultsThe 2-year survival time and objective response rate of the treatment group of camrelizumab combined with TACE plus sorafenib were higher than those of TACE plus sorafenib. Camrelizumab increased the proportion of reactive capillary proliferation, but had no effect on other adverse reactions. The established nomogram can accurately predict the response to the treatment.
ConclusionsCamrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib can improve the survival rate of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and it is an effective treatment. The Nomogram model can predict the e cacy, which is bene cial for patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.