Abnormalities of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract due to drugs (AGIDs) are numerous and have significant impact. The aim of this narrative review is to help the practicing surgical pathologist recognize selected AGIDs. The adverse drug effects presented were chosen with an emphasis on recent and significant pathological and clinical contributions. The selection was based on a thorough review of the PUBMED-based literature and on the authors' opinions and experience. In the first part of the review, diagnostic abnormalities due to crystals (eg, iron, biphosphonates, nonsystemic drugs), mitosis arresting drugs (colchicine, taxanes), and biological agents, especially ipilimumab, are discussed. Some AGIDs' histopathologic features can be easily recognized. It is however the clinical correlation that in many cases of AGIDs will provide the necessary support for a drug effect diagnosis. The identification of AGIDs requires heightened awareness of the medical team in which close collaboration of pathologists and clinicians cannot be overemphasized.

In keeping with the stated goal of providing the surgical pathologist with tools to recognize abnormalities of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract due to drugs (AGIDS), in part II of this review we embark in a more organ-based description of AGIDS. Adequate space is given to the numerous adverse gastrointestinal effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pill esophagitis, esophagitis dissecans, proton pump inhibitors' effects, diaphragm disease, and the recently described effects of drugs such as olmesartan, mycophenolate, and of compounds such as yttrium-90 are highlighted among several others. The inclusion of drug effects in the differential diagnosis of "conventional" diseases (such as gastric antral vascular ectasia, graft-versus-host disease, ischemic colitis, acute colitis, collagenous enteritis, inflammatory bowel disease) is underscored to avoid sometimes significant diagnostic pitfalls. We reiterate the message of the necessary collaboration between pathologist and clinician in the recognition of these entities to provide the best patient care.

Introduction: Despite the controversy concerning sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), successful detection rates can be achieved by radioguidance and vital dyeing. However, the drawbacks in both techniques are notable. Magnetic-guided SLNB (mSLNB) using superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles is appealing as an alternative procedure. Materials and Methods: mSLNB using the Sentimag-Sienna System ® , total thyroidectomy and central compartment dissection (CCD) were performed on all PTC patients. Lymph node involvement was assessed by postoperative pathological examination. Results: From 2014 to 2016, 33 consecutive patients with PTC were enrolled in the study. A total of 20 patients met the eligibility. mSLNB succeeded in 16 patients, with a detection rate of 80%. A median of two SLN per patient were detected. A median of 10.5 non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN) from CCD were examined. Among the patients, 56.25% (9/16) had no metastatic nodes, while 12.5% (2/16) had exclusively SLN involvement. No false negative cases were found. The agreement between SLN and NSLN status was 87.5%. The prediction of NSLN involvement by SLN status showed 100% sensitivity, 81.8% specificity, 71.4% PPV and 100% NPV. Subsequently, mSLNB and the final pathological analysis would discriminate 43.75% (7/16) of patients who would certainly benefit from CCD whilst 56.25% of the total would confirm an unnecessary lymphadenectomy and avoid morbidity. Conclusion: mSLNB showed satisfactory performance in PTC with clinical-negative nodes. We have shown mSLNB to be a good predictor of central compartment status that can improve the staging and management of PTC patients.

BACKGROUND:The cytological diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (MM) on serous effusion is challenging due to significant morphologic overlap with reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma. One of the morphologic features of MM in effusion cytology, small orangiophilic squamous-like cells (SOSLC), has received little attention.To the best of the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to assess the sensitivity and specificity of

No abstract