ABSTRACT:Thirty-one structurally diverse marketed central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs, one active metabolite, and seven non-CNSactive compounds were tested in three P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro assays: transwell assays using MDCK, human MDR1-MDCK, and mouse Mdr1a-MDCK cells, ATPase, and calcein AM inhibition. Additionally, the permeability for these compounds was measured in two in vitro models: parallel artificial membrane permeation assay and apical-to-basolateral apparent permeability in MDCK. The exposure of the same set of compounds in brain and plasma was measured in P-gp knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice after subcutaneous administration. One drug and its metabolite, risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone, of the 32 CNS compounds, and 6 of the 7 non-CNS drugs were determined to have positive efflux using ratio of ratios in MDR1-MDCK versus MDCK transwell assays. Data from transwell studies correlated well with the brainto-plasma area under the curve ratios between P-gp KO and WT mice for the 32 CNS compounds. In addition, 3300 Pfizer compounds were tested in MDR1-MDCK and Mdr1a-MDCK transwell assays, with a good correlation (R 2 ‫؍‬ 0.92) between the efflux ratios in human MDR1-MDCK and mouse Mdr1a-MDCK cells. Permeability data showed that the majority of the 32 CNS compounds have moderate to high passive permeability. This work has demonstrated that in vitro transporter assays help in understanding the role of P-gp-mediated efflux activity in determining the disposition of CNS drugs in vivo, and the transwell assay is a valuable in vitro assay to evaluate human P-gp interaction with compounds for assessing brain penetration of new chemical entities to treat CNS disorders.Human P-glycoprotein (P-gp, MDR1) is known to be a determinant of drug absorption, distribution, and excretion of a number of clinically important drugs (Ambudkar et al., 1999;Fromm, 2000). P-gp is widely expressed in major organs, and, more specifically, P-gp is highly expressed in the capillaries of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and poses a barrier to brain penetration of its substrates (Schinkel, 1999). Given that P-gp efflux liability can be a major hurdle for CNS therapeutic drugs to cross the BBB and reach the target, the interactions of CNS compounds with P-gp may lead to the lack of CNS activity as a result of the decreased brain penetration. Thus, the prediction and understanding of the relevance of P-gp-mediated efflux transport have become important activities in the discovery and development of CNS drugs. In attempts to predict the effects of P-gp in vivo, a variety of in vitro P-gp assays have been developed to classify compounds as P-gp substrates. For instance, transwell-based assays using polarized cell lines such as the Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line. The MDCK cell line can be stably transfected with human MDR1 or mouse Mdr1a (MDR1-MDCK or Mdr1a-MDCK, respectively). Comparison of the efflux ratios between MDR1-MDCK and MDCK transwell assays can provide a measure of the specific human P-gp-mediated e...

No abstract

ABSTRACT:Cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4) is the principal drug-metabolizing enzyme in human liver. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) caused by induction of CYP3A4 can result in decreased exposure to coadministered drugs, with potential loss of efficacy. Immortalized hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells) have been proposed as a tool to identify CYP3A4 inducers. The purpose of the current studies was to characterize the effect of known inducers on CYP3A4 in Fa2N-4 cells, and to determine whether these in vitro data could reliably project the magnitude of DDIs caused by induction. Twenty-four compounds were chosen for these studies, based on previously published data using primary human hepatocytes. Eighteen compounds had been shown to be positive for induction, and six compounds had been shown to be negative for induction. In Cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4) is the major drug-metabolizing enzyme in human liver and is responsible for the clearance of many commonly used drugs, including benzodiazepines, statins, calcium channel blockers, and HIV protease inhibitors. Certain drugs can modulate the level of CYP3A4 activity, thereby causing changes in clearance of coadministered drugs that are CYP3A4 substrates. Levels of CYP3A4 activity can be decreased by inhibition of enzyme activity, or increased by induction of new protein synthesis. Changes in CYP3A4 activity, either through inhibition or induction, can result in potentially serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Whereas assays for evaluating inhibition of CYP3A4 are routine and the relationship between in vitro data and in vivo effects relatively well understood (Bjornsson et al., 2003), assays for evaluating induction are less well characterized and the relationships between in vitro and in vivo data less clear.Induction of CYP3A4 is thought to occur primarily through transcriptional activation of the gene. The 5Ј-regulatory region of the CYP3A4 gene contains elements that bind various transcription factors that can up-or down-regulate transcription. One such transcription factor is the pregnane X receptor (PXR). PXR is a ligand-activated transcription factor that is activated by a variety of drugs and endogenous compounds to increase transcription of CYP3A4 as well as other drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters (Kliewer et al., 2002). Most drugs that induce levels of CYP3A4 are thought to do so primarily via PXR activation, e.g., rifampicin, phenytoin, hyperforin, and clotrimazole (Lehmann et al., 1998). There are several in vitro tools for assessment of CYP3A4 induction. To this point, primary human hepatocyte cultures have been considered the gold standard for in vitro induction assessment (Madan et al., 2003). Primary hepatocytes are typically treated with test compound for 2 or 3 days; then, CYP3A4 levels are compared with those in vehicle-treated cells. CYP3A4 expression can be evaluated by measuring enzymatic activity with a selective probe substrate or by measuring CYP3A4 mRNA. Primary hepatocytes are considered a reliable way to assess induction; however, ability to atta...

No abstract

Tissue chips are poised to deliver a paradigm shift in drug discovery. By emulating human physiology, these chips have the potential to increase the predictive power of preclinical modeling, which in turn will move the pharmaceutical industry closer to its aspiration of clinically relevant and ultimately animal-free drug discovery. Despite the tremendous science and innovation invested in these tissue chips, significant challenges remain to be addressed to enable their routine adoption into the industrial laboratory. This article describes the main steps that need to be taken and highlights key considerations in order to transform tissue chip technology from the hands of the innovators into those of the industrial scientists. Written by scientists from 13 pharmaceutical companies and partners at the National Institutes of Health, this article uniquely captures a consensus view on the progression strategy to facilitate and accelerate the adoption of this valuable technology. It concludes that success will be delivered by a partnership approach as well as a deep understanding of the context within which these chips will actually be used. Impact statement The rapid pace of scientific innovation in the tissue chip (TC) field requires a cohesive partnership between innovators and end users. Near term uptake of these human-relevant platforms will fill gaps in current capabilities for assessing important properties of disposition, efficacy and safety liabilities. Similarly, these platforms could support mechanistic studies which aim to resolve challenges later in development (e.g. assessing the human relevance of a liability identified in animal studies). Building confidence that novel capabilities of TCs can address real world challenges while they themselves are being developed will accelerate their application in the discovery and development of innovative medicines. This article outlines a strategic roadmap to unite innovators and end users thus making implementation smooth and rapid. With the collective contributions from multiple international pharmaceutical companies and partners at National Institutes of Health, this article should serve as an invaluable resource to the multi-disciplinary field of TC development.