Purpose of review This review explores four different approaches and clarifies objectives for debriefing after a clinical event in the emergency department. Psychological debriefing aims to prevent or reduce symptoms of traumatic stress and normalize recovery. Psychological first aid helps team members provide each other with pragmatic social support. Debriefing for simulation-based education promotes learning by team members. Quality improvement approaches and after action reviews focus on systems improvement. Recent findings Qualitative studies have begun to explore interactions between clinical staff after a significant clinical event. Clearer descriptions and measurements of quality improvements and the effect of clinical event debriefing on patient outcomes are appearing. An increasing number of studies describe melded, scripted approaches to the hot debrief. Summary Clinical staff have consistently indicated they value debriefing after a significant clinical event. Differing objectives from different approaches have translated into a wide variety of methods and a lack of clarity about relevant outcomes to measure. Recent descriptions of scripted approaches may clarify these objectives and pave the way for measuring relevant outcomes that demonstrate the effectiveness of and find the place for debriefing in the emergency department.

Background Wellness is increasingly recognized as an important component of graduate medical education. However, there are limited data regarding how wellness initiatives are enacted in practice. This study aimed to survey emergency medicine (EM) residency programs to identify current, previous, and planned wellness initiatives as well as barriers to implementation and resources utilized. Methods This was a cross‐sectional survey study performed from November 2019 through January 2020. A literature search was performed to identify existing published wellness interventions and existing barriers, and these interventions and barriers were compiled to create a survey. The survey was piloted among five program directors and assistant program directors in person with feedback directly incorporated into the survey. The survey was sent to program leadership at all 223 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited EM residency programs across the United States. Results Of the programs surveyed, 95 (42.6%) were included. The most common current wellness interventions reported were resident retreats (91%), group events (90%), formal mentorship (74%), and wellness committees (66%). Reported factors that contributed to the successful implementation of wellness interventions were faculty involvement (78%), resident involvement (78%), department chair support (51%), institutional support (44%), and financial support (36%). Lack of financial support (65%) and limited time (62%) were the most commonly reported barriers that prevented the implementation of wellness interventions. Conclusions Resident wellness is an important aspect of residency training. Survey respondents generally perceived that wellness interventions were associated with wellness improvement. Successful programs have financial, institutional, and chair support.

No abstract

No abstract