Studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) suggest a protective effect of anti-A antibodies against viral cell entry that may hold relevance for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether ABO blood groups are associated with different severities of COVID-19. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis and nested prospective observational substudy of critically ill patients with COVID-19. We collected data pertaining to age, sex, comorbidities, dates of symptom onset, hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), standard laboratory parameters, and serum inflammatory cytokines. National (N = 398 671; P = .38) and provincial (n = 62 246; P = .60) ABO blood group distributions did not differ from our cohort (n = 95). A higher proportion of COVID-19 patients with blood group A or AB required mechanical ventilation (P = .02) and CRRT (P = .004) and had a longer ICU stay (P = .03) compared with patients with blood group O or B. Blood group A or AB also had an increased probability of requiring mechanical ventilation and CRRT after adjusting for age, sex, and presence of ≥1 comorbidity. Inflammatory cytokines did not differ between patients with blood group A or AB (n = 11) vs O or B (n = 14; P > .10 for all cytokines). Collectively, our data indicate that critically ill COVID-19 patients with blood group A or AB are at increased risk for requiring mechanical ventilation, CRRT, and prolonged ICU admission compared with patients with blood group O or B. Further work is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objectives: We sought to characterize 1) the difference in the diffusion gradient of cellular oxygen delivery and 2) the presence of diffusion limitation physiology in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury patients with brain hypoxia, as defined by parenchymal brain tissue oxygen tension less than 20 mm Hg versus normoxia (brain tissue oxygen tension > 20 mm Hg). Design: Post hoc subanalysis of a prospective study in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury patients dichotomized into those with brain hypoxia versus normoxia. Setting: Quaternary ICU. Patients: Fourteen adult hypoxic-ischemic brain injury patients after cardiac arrest. Interventions: Patients underwent monitoring with brain oxygen tension, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, and jugular venous bulb oxygen saturation. Data were recorded in real time at 300Hz into the ICM+ monitoring software (Cambridge University Enterprises, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Simultaneous arterial and jugular venous bulb blood gas samples were recorded prospectively. Measurements and Main Results: Both the normoxia and hypoxia groups consisted of seven patients. In the normoxia group, the mean brain tissue oxygen tension, jugular venous bulb oxygen tension, and cerebral perfusion pressure were 29 mm Hg (sd, 9), 45 mm Hg (sd, 9), and 80 mm Hg (sd, 7), respectively. In the hypoxia group, the mean brain tissue oxygen tension, jugular venous bulb oxygen to brain tissue oxygen tension gradient, and cerebral perfusion pressure were 14 mm Hg (sd, 4), 53 mm Hg (sd, 8), and 72 mm Hg (sd, 6), respectively. There were significant differences in the jugular venous bulb oxygen tension–brain oxygen tension gradient (16 mm Hg [sd, 6] vs 39 mm Hg sd, 11]; p < 0.001) and in the relationship of jugular venous bulb oxygen tension–brain oxygen tension gradient to cerebral perfusion pressure (p = 0.004) when comparing normoxia to hypoxia. Each 1 mm Hg increase in cerebral perfusion pressure led to a decrease in the jugular venous bulb oxygen tension–brain oxygen tension gradient by 0.36 mm Hg (95% CI, –0.54 to 0.18; p < 0.001) in the normoxia group, but no such relation was demonstrable in the hypoxia group. Conclusions: In hypoxic-ischemic brain injury patients with brain hypoxia, there is an elevation in the jugular venous bulb oxygen tension–brain oxygen tension gradient, which is not modulated by changes in cerebral perfusion pressure.

IMPORTANCE Brain injury biomarkers released into circulation from the injured neurovascular unit are important prognostic tools in patients with cardiac arrest who develop hypoxic ischemic brain injury (HIBI) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).OBJECTIVE To assess the neuroprognostic utility of bloodborne brain injury biomarkers in patients with cardiac arrest with HIBI.DATA SOURCES Studies in electronic databases from inception to September 15, 2021. These databases included MEDLINE, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the World Health Organization Global Health Library.STUDY SELECTION Articles included in this systmatic review and meta-analysis were independently assessed by 2 reviewers. We included studies that investigated neuron-specific enolase, S100 calcium-binding protein β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light, tau, or ubiquitin carboxyl hydrolase L1 in patients with cardiac arrest aged 18 years and older for neurologic prognostication. We excluded studies that did not (1) dichotomize neurologic outcome as favorable vs unfavorable, (2) specify the timing of blood sampling or outcome determination, or (3) report diagnostic test accuracy or biomarker concentration.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data on the study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, brain biomarkers levels, diagnostic test accuracy, and neurologic outcome were recorded. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and optimal thresholds for each biomarker. Risk of bias and concerns of applicability were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTSWe identified 2953 studies, of which 86 studies with 10 567 patients (7777 men [73.6] and 2790 women [26.4]; pooled mean [SD] age, 62.8 [10.2] years) were included. Biomarker analysis at 48 hours after ROSC demonstrated that neurofilament light had the highest predictive value for unfavorable neurologic outcome, with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97). Subgroup analyses of patients treated with targeted temperature management and those who specifically had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest showed similar results (targeted temperature management, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95] and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Neurofilament light, which reflects white matter damage and axonal injury, yielded the highest accuracy in predicting neurologic outcome in patients with HIBI at 48 hours after ROSC.