Understanding the impacts of long‐term fertilizer management and rotation diversity on soil C and N is needed under a changing climate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of N fertilizer level and crop rotation diversity on soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil N stocks from a 34‐yr study located in eastern Nebraska. Seven crop rotations (three continuous cropping systems; two 2‐yr crop rotations; and two 4‐yr crop rotations) and three N levels were compared. Soil samples were taken to a depth of 150 cm. Differences in SOC stocks were largely confined to the 0‐ to 7.5‐cm depth, with greater SOC (P = .0002) in rotations than continuous cropping systems and greater SOC (P = .0004) in 4‐yr vs. 2‐yr rotations. Total soil N was greater with increased crop rotation diversity for the 0‐ to 30‐cm soil profile. Greater SOC levels occurred with N fertilization for the 0‐ to 7.5‐cm depth. At the 0‐ to 150‐cm soil depth, SOC stocks were similar between N levels and greater for the 4‐yr vs. 2‐yr crop rotations (P = .0492). Trends in total N stocks were similar to those of SOC stocks. Overall, crop rotation had a larger effect on SOC and N stocks than N fertilizer.
A study was conducted at three sites in North Dakota to strengthen understanding of the usefulness of different proximal geophysical data types in agricultural contexts of varying pedology. This study hypothesizes that electromagnetic induction (EMI), gamma‐ray sensor (GRS), cosmic‐ray neutron sensor (CRNS), and elevation data layers are all useful in multiple linear regression (MLR) predictions of soil properties that meet expert criteria at three agricultural sites. In addition to geophysical data collection with vehicle‐mounted sensors, 15 soil samples were collected at each site and analyzed for nine soil properties of interest. A set of model training data was compiled by pairing the sampled soil property measurements with the nearest geophysical data. Eleven models passed expert‐defined uncertainty criteria at Site 1, 16 passed at Site 2, and 14 passed at Site 3. Electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), available water holding capacity, silt, and clay were predicted at Site 1 with an R‐squared of prediction false(Rpred2false)$(R_{pred}^2)$ > .50 and acceptable root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). Bulk density (BD), OM, available water capacity, silt, and clay were predicted with Rpred2$R_{pred}^2$ > .50 and acceptable RMSEP at Site 2. At Site 3, no soil properties were predicted with acceptable RMSEP and an Rpred2$R_{pred}^2$ > .50. These results confirm feasibility of our method, and the authors recommend the prioritization of EMI data collection if geophysical data collection is limited to a single mapping effort and calibration soil samples are few.
<p>Detection of gamma-rays emitted by K-40 decay demonstrates potential for reliable soil moisture estimation for agricultural and hydrological applications. With a circular footprint of roughly 20 m radius, gamma-ray spectroscopy (GRS) provides a continuous, non-invasive average measurement that fills the scale gap between point and satellite data. GRS sensors have also been successfully integrated with Unmanned Aerial Systems opening the potential for soil moisture mapping.&#160; Current theoretical models of gamma-ray spectra and soil moisture have not been extensively tested with empirical data. An existing soil moisture model for NaI gamma-ray spectra includes a method for biomass water content correction and was tested with five sampling campaigns in a tomato field, while another soil moisture model was tested with a single sampling campaign in a sugar beet field using CsI gamma-ray spectra. We hypothesize that testing existing theoretical models with thorough empirical data over a range of soil moisture and vegetative conditions will increase our understanding of the relationship between gamma-ray spectra, soil moisture, and biomass, and will allow us to validate and/or improve the soil moisture calibration function.</p> <p>In this study we conduct a robust calibration of a stationary CsI gamma-ray soil moisture sensor (gSMS, Medusa Radiometrics) against gravimetric water content samples at a long term agricultural experimental field in eastern Nebraska, United States. Additional measurements include an Eddy Covariance tower, a Cosmic-Ray Neutron Sensor, in-situ soil moisture sensors, and destructive vegetation sampling every 10 days during the growing season. In total, 18 sampling campaigns were conducted between June 2021 and October 2022 under bare soil, maize, and soybean conditions. Soil samples were collected in a radial pattern at 0, 2, 5, and 12 m from the sensor, every 60 degrees following the expected spatial sensitivity of the gSMS. Samples from the 19 locations surrounding the sensor were aggregated in 5 cm intervals from 0 to 35 cm depth. Both a depth-weighting function and the arithmetic mean were used to calculate the average gravimetric water content within the sensing volume.</p> <p>We then leverage the relatively large experimental data set of gravimetric water content and K-40 counts to test current theoretical approaches to soil moisture estimation with GRS. Data from both bare soil and vegetated conditions allow us to investigate and potentially remove the biomass water content signal from the soil moisture estimation. Comparison with the existing theoretical calibration functions shows large deviations with the empirical data. &#160;Cosmic-ray Neutron Sensor data recorded at the site shows a high degree of correlation (R > 0.7 for hourly data) between the K-40 counts and neutron counts under changing biomass conditions. Lastly, comparison of the GRS derived soil moisture data with the in-situ soil moisture sensors, rainfall, and evapotranspiration result in good correspondence with soil moisture state and water fluxes at the study site.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.