Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility are evident with exposure to healthcare, the presence of a FC, and a history of resistant pathogens. Risk-based empirical prescribing and rapid de-escalation may improve care and reduce costs.

Background- Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic infection seen in immunosuppressed patients, including solid-organ transplant recipients. Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) has long been considered first-line therapy for PCP prophylaxis. Optimal dosing regimens in solid-organ transplant recipients have not been fully defined. Objective-To examine the tolerability of a 1-year, 3-times weekly, prophylactic regimen of a single-strength SMX/TMP tablet. Study Design-Single-center, retrospective cohort study. Setting-A tertiary-care medical center, including inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient transplant clinic visits. Patients-Adult patients who received a kidney transplant between December 1, 2010, and November 30, 2012, at Hartford Hospital. Patients receiving a concurrent extrarenal transplant were excluded. Patients' charts were reviewed for up to 1 year after transplant. Results-A total of 88 patients were included in the analysis. Sixty-seven patients finished a full year of SMX/TMP after transplant, 10 patients discontinued SMX/TMP less than 1 year after transplant, and 11 patients started taking atovaquone instead of SMX/TMP after transplant. Documented reasons for discontinuation included hyperkalemia, leukopenia, diarrhea, and simplification of medication regimen. Patients without a documented reason for discontinuation did not have any obvious anomalies in laboratory values that would account for the discontinuation. Patients who received atovaquone for PCP prophylaxis had higher rates of recurrent urinary tract infections than did patients who received SMX/TMP for prophylaxis (33% vs 7%, P = .02). A longer postoperative stay (median [interquartile range, IQR] 13 [8.25-26] days vs 7 [6-9.5] days, P = .02), higher rates of delayed graft function (50% vs 10%, P = .004), as well as higher serum creatinine levels on postoperative day 7 (6.25 [2.4-10.1] mg/dL vs 1.8 [1.2-4.2] mg/dL, P= .01), postoperative month 1 (1.9 [0.8] mg/dL vs 1.4 [0.5] mg/dL, P = .002), and postoperative month 12 (1.6 [0.5] mg/dL vs 1.3 [0.3] mg/dL, P = .04) were associated with early SMX/TMP discontinuation. Conclusion-A low-dose prophylactic SMX/TMP regimen of 1 single-strength tablet 3 times weekly is well tolerated. Discontinuation rates were lower than other rates reported for higher-dose regimens.

Use of rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed at the CD20 antigen, continues to increase in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for several off-label uses. In September 2013, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication to oncology, rheumatology and pharmacy communities outlining a new Boxed Warning for rituximab. Citing 109 cases of fatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in persons receiving rituximab therapy with previous or chronic HBV infection documented in their Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS), the FDA recommends screening for HBV serologies in all patients planned to receive rituximab and antiviral prophylaxis in any patient with a positive history of HBV infection. There is a lack of data pertaining to this topic in the SOT population despite an increase in off-label indications. Previous reports suggest patients receiving rituximab, on average, were administered six doses prior to HBV reactivation. Recommendations on prophylaxis, treatment and rechallenging patients with therapy after resolution of reactivation remain unclear. Based on data from the FDA AERS and multiple analyses in oncology, SOT providers utilizing rituximab should adhere to the FDA warnings and recommendations regarding HBV reactivation until further data are available in the SOT population.

What is known and Objective Currently, there are limited data on ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship (AAMS) programmes in the primary care setting. The purpose of this study was to implement a pharmacist‐led AAMS programme for uncomplicated cystitis (UC) and pyelonephritis in a hospital‐based family medicine residency clinic. Methods A retrospective cohort study was used to assess clinician prescribing habits and identify areas of inappropriate prescribing. Females between 18 and 64 years old diagnosed with UC or pyelonephritis were included in the analysis. The primary objective was a composite of appropriate choice of antibiotic based on first‐line recommendations, appropriate dose and appropriate duration of therapy. The intervention included development of a guideline‐based antibiotic treatment summary accessible in the electronic health record (EHR), clinician education sessions for medical residents and faculty, and treatment defaults in the EHR. Results and Discussion Eighty‐one patients were included in the pre‐intervention group and 81 in the post‐intervention group. In the pre‐intervention group, 37% of patients met the composite primary outcome vs. 71.6% in the post‐intervention group (P < .001) for UC and pyelonephritis combined. This was primarily driven by improvement in appropriate duration of therapy for both diagnoses which increased from 44.4% to 84.0% (P < .001). What is new and Conclusions A pharmacist‐led AAMS programme significantly improved guideline‐based treatment adherence for UC and pyelonephritis based on the composite of appropriate choice of antibiotic, appropriate dose and appropriate duration of therapy in a primary care family medicine setting.