Background Acquired epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation is the primary resistance mechanism to first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in advanced, EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Available data, predominantly in Asian patients, suggest that this mutation is also the major cause of resistance to the irreversible ErbB family blocker, afatinib. For EGFR T790M-positive patients who progress on EGFR TKI therapy, osimertinib is an effective treatment option. However, data on osimertinib use after afatinib are, to date, scarce. Objective To identify the prevalence of EGFR T790M mutations in predominantly Caucasian patients with stage IV EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who progressed on afatinib, and to investigate the subsequent response to osimertinib. Patients and Methods In this single-center, retrospective analysis, EGFR T790M mutation status after afatinib failure was assessed using liquid biopsy and tissue rebiopsy. EGFR T790M-positive patients subsequently received osimertinib. Results Sixty-seven patients received afatinib in the first-, second-, or third-line (80.6%, 14.9%, and 4.5%, respectively). After afatinib failure, the T790M mutation was identified in 49 patients (73.1%). Liquid biopsy and tissue rebiopsy were concordant in 79.4% of cases. All patients with T790M-positive tumors received osimertinib (73.5% after first-line afatinib); 37 (75.5%) of these had an objective response (complete response: 22.4%; partial response: 53.1%). Response rate was independent of T790M copy number. Conclusion EGFR T790M mutation is a major mechanism of acquired resistance to afatinib. Osimertinib confers high response rates after afatinib failure in EGFR T790M-positive patients and its use in sequence potentially allows extended chemotherapy-free treatment.

Plasma genotyping using digital polymerase chain reaction is clinically useful for the selection of patients who had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy for treatment with osimertinib.

Background Analysis of cell-free DNA from blood could provide an alternative method for identifying genomic changes in the tumors of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Objective We compared the performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and Cobas ® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Cobas) for detecting EGFR mutations in cell-free plasma DNA. Patients and Methods Plasma samples from patients with advanced EGFR -mutated lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed for EGFR T790M, exon 19 deletions, and L858R mutations by both ddPCR and Cobas. Results T790M testing was performed in 354 plasma samples collected from 129 patients. The concordance rate between ddPCR and Cobas for T790M, sensitivity, and specificity were 86, 100, and 85%, respectively. Exon 19 deletions were analyzed in 196 plasma samples obtained from 71 of the 129 patients using both platforms. The concordance rate between ddPCR and Cobas for exon 19 deletions, sensitivity, and specificity were 90, 92, and 89%, respectively. L858R mutations were studied in 124 plasma samples obtained from 44 of the 129 patients using both assays. The concordance rate between ddPCR and Cobas for L858R, sensitivity, and specificity were 90, 91, and 89%, respectively. In patients who progressed under treatment with an EGFR TKI ( n = 50), the T790M positivity rate was 66% using ddPCR, but only 24% using Cobas. Conclusions We observed a high concordance between ddPCR and Cobas in detecting EGFR mutations in plasma samples of patients with advanced EGFR -mutated lung adenocarcinoma, but ddPCR was more sensitive than Cobas.