Background and Aims Patients suffering from polycystic liver disease (PLD) can develop large liver volumes, leading to physical and psychological complaints, reducing quality of life. There is an unmet need for new therapies in these patients. Estrogen seems to be a promising target for new therapies. In this review, we summarize the available experimental and epidemiological evidence to unravel the role of estrogens and other female hormones in PLD, to answer clinical questions and identify new targets for therapy. Methods We identified all experimental and epidemiologial studies concerning estrogens or other female hormones and PLD, to answer pre‐defined clinial questions. Results Female sex is the most important risk factor for the presence and severity of disease; estrogen supplementation enhances liver growth and after menopause, liver growth decreases. Experimental studies show the presence of the estrogen receptors alfa and beta on cystic cholangiocytes, and increased in vitro growth after administration of estrogen. Conclusions Based on the available evidence, female PLD patients should be discouraged from taking estrogen‐containing contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy. Since liver growth rates decline after menopause, treatment decisions should be based on measured liver growth in postmenopausal women. Finally, blockage of estrogen receptors or estrogen production is a promising target for new therapies.
Introduction Gallstones are a known adverse effect of somatostatin analogs, but the exact incidence and clinical implications are unknown.Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of gallstones on imaging and related complications in unbiased trial data. Methods Data from the DIPAK 1 trial, in which 305 polycystic kidney disease patients were randomized to standard of care (SoC) or lanreotide for 120 weeks, were used. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline and end of treatment and was assessed for the presence, number, and size of gallstones. For all patients who had gallstones at the end of the trial, we obtained follow-up after the trial. Results Of 249 patients with data available, 11 patients randomized to lanreotide and four randomized to SoC had gallstones at baseline. During the study, new gallstones were formed in 19/124 patients using lanreotide (15%) and 1/125 patients receiving SoC (1%). The odds ratio for gallstone formation with lanreotide use was 25.9 (95% confidence interval 3.37-198.8; p < 0.001). Gallstones during lanreotide treatment were multiple (> 20 stones in 69% of patients) and small (≤ 3 mm in 63% of patients). Of the 19 patients with incident gallstones during lanreotide treatment, 9 experienced gallstone-associated complications, 8 of whom experienced gallstone-associated complications after discontinuation of treatment (median time after discontinuation 2.5 years). In patients with gallstones at baseline and in patients receiving SoC, no complications occurred. Conclusions Treatment with a somatostatin analog leads to the formation of multiple, small gallstones that are associated with severe complications, especially after discontinuation of therapy. Clinical Trial Registry Website and Trial Number ClinicalTrials.gov (https:// clini caltr ials. gov); NCT01616927.A list of DIPAK consortium members is given in the Acknowledgments section.
Objectives Polycystic liver disease (PLD) is characterized by growth of hepatic cysts, causing hepatomegaly. Disease severity is determined using total liver volume (TLV), which can be measured from computed tomography (CT). The gold standard is manual segmentation which is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge of the anatomy. This study aims to validate the commercially available semi-automatic MMWP (Multimodality Workplace) Volume tool for CT scans of PLD patients. Methods We included adult patients with one (n = 60) or two (n = 46) abdominal CT scans. Semi-automatic contouring was compared with manual segmentation, using comparison of observed volumes (cross-sectional) and growth (longitudinal), correlation coefficients (CC), and Bland-Altman analyses with bias and precision, defined as the mean difference and SD from this difference. Inter- and intra-reader variability were assessed using coefficients of variation (CV) and we assessed the time to perform both procedures. Results Median TLV was 5292.2 mL (IQR 3141.4–7862.2 mL) at baseline. Cross-sectional analysis showed high correlation and low bias and precision between both methods (CC 0.998, bias 1.62%, precision 2.75%). Absolute volumes were slightly higher for semi-automatic segmentation (manual 5292.2 (3141.4–7862.2) versus semi-automatic 5432.8 (3071.9–7960.2) mL, difference 2.7%, p < 0.001). Longitudinal analysis demonstrated that semi-automatic segmentation accurately measures liver growth (CC 0.908, bias 0.23%, precision 4.04%). Inter- and intra-reader variability were small (2.19% and 0.66%) and comparable to manual segmentation (1.21% and 0.63%) (p = 0.26 and p = 0.37). Semi-automatic segmentation was faster than manual tracing (19 min versus 50 min, p = 0.009). Conclusions Semi-automatic liver segmentation is a fast and accurate method to determine TLV and liver growth in PLD patients. Key Points • Semi-automatic liver segmentation using the commercially available MMWP volume tool accurately determines total liver volume as well as liver growth over time in polycystic liver disease patients. • This method is considerably faster than manual segmentation through the use of Hounsfield unit settings. • We used a real-life CT set for the validation and showed that the semi-automatic tool measures accurately regardless of contrast used for the CT scan or not, presence of polycystic kidneys, liver volume, and previous invasive treatment for polycystic liver disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.