Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus (HLE) is a rare variant of lupus erythematosus, occurring in 2% of cases of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). It is an exaggerated proliferative epithelial response manifesting as verrucous-appearing hypertrophic indurated lesions occurring on sun-exposed sites. We present a case of the development of extensive HLE in a patient with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) with underlying pulmonary malignancy. A 74-year-old woman with Sjögren syndrome presented to dermatology with a 2-month history of a rash affecting her face and décolletage. Laboratory studies illustrated elevated antinuclear and anti-Ro antibodies. Biopsy from her chest confirmed SCLE. Malignancy screening revealed T1aN0 pulmonary lepidic adenocarcinoma, which was successfully managed with a lower lobectomy. Hydroxychloroquine was initially trialled but required discontinuation following intolerable side-effects. Mepacrine was then initiated, which allowed clearance of the rash, alongside yellow discoloration of the skin. Six months later, she developed a raised pruritic rash on her arms, legs and buttocks, resistant to current management alongside a trial of mycophenolate mofetil. Examination revealed violaceous hypertrophic plaques affecting 40% of her body-­surface area. The differential included hypertrophic lichen planus, nodular prurigo and HLE. Repeat lesional biopsies highlighted a lichenoid inflammatory infiltrate with overlying scale, favouring HLE. Owing to patient choice, topical mometasone furoate 0.1% was used to manage cutaneous disease, with a reduction in lesion size. HLE is a distinct subset of CCLE, regarded as a separate entity to SCLE. Twenty per cent of patients with SCLE also exhibit other types of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) lesions. No cases in the literature describe progression from SCLE to CCLE, or HLE, in particular. Hallmarks of HLE include verrucous lesions, chronicity and treatment resistance. Early recognition and follow-up are essential as malignancy may arise in long-standing lesions. Lung adenocarcinomas and hypertrophic lupus are both associated with p53 mutations and decreased granzyme B expression. Mutated p53 results in constitutive cell proliferation and DNA damage can accumulate in cells. Granzyme B is a protease in cytotoxic T cells involved in immune-mediated cell lysis. Both processes result in the potential to produce exaggerated hyperproliferative lesions, such as those observed in HLE and the lepidic adenocarcinomas. HLE is a rare clinical entity that can be easily misdiagnosed clinically and histopathologically. Increased awareness of this condition is essential to highlight the variety of clinical presentations of uncommon variants of CLE, to ensure they are considered while approaching clinical diagnosis.

Lupus comedonicus (LC) is an exceedingly rare variant of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), with only 13 reported cases in the literature to date. While its aetiology remains unknown, hallmarks include the presence of comedones on erythematous plaques, particularly in seborrhoeic areas. We report a case of LC involving the scalp, concha bowl and upper back. A 53-year-old female smoker with a 20-pack-year history and previous unprovoked pulmonary embolism presented to dermatology with a 2-year history of alopecia and rash affecting her face and upper back. She was initially reviewed by oral medicine for ulcers, where erythematous buccal mucosal plaques with white striations were seen. The initial biopsy showed a patchy lichenoid inflammatory infiltrate, raising suspicions for lichen planus; however, repeat biopsy highlighted perivascular inflammation and keratin plugging suggestive of lupus. Full skin examination revealed patchy scarring alopecia with perifollicular scale and erythema. Erythematous infiltrated plaques were seen on the face with similar more indurated lesions on the upper back associated with open comedones. The eponymous Shuster sign was observed in the left conchal bowl, with associated follicular occlusion. Laboratory studies all returned within normal limits, including antinuclear antibody titres and complement levels. Differential diagnosis included lupus erythematosus tumidus, discoid lupus erythematosus and LC. Lesional biopsies taken from her back confirmed LC, highlighting lichenoid inflammation involving follicles and interfollicular skin, with superficial and deep perivascular infiltrate. We commenced oral hydroxychloroquine at 200 mg once daily for management, with topical mometasone furoate 0.1% to be used while awaiting its full effect. Smoking cessation has also been advised given the potentially antagonistic effect of smoking with lupus and hydroxychloroquine. Hypotheses of the pathogenesis of LC include the effect of sun exposure. Ultraviolet radiation is known to not only enhance the activity of CCLE but may also contribute to the formation of comedones. Actinic damage alters collagen of normal skin, promoting sebum retention and follicular plugging. Given its infrequency, LC could be mistaken for benign conditions, including acne vulgaris, naevus comedonicus and Favre–Racouchot disease. It is plausible that the small case numbers are due to current underdiagnoses. It is important for dermatologists to be aware of and accurately diagnose LC. Apart from its potentially destructive, scarring complications, especially in untreated and misdiagnosed cases, it is associated with systemic lupus in 30% of cases. Delay in diagnosis and therapeutic management can be associated with significant potential morbidity and even mortality.

A man in his 80s had a 4-week history of progressive weakness and fatigue, with associated development of purple bruiselike lesions on his head. What is your diagnosis?

No abstract

No abstract