This study was designed to assess, retrospectively using dental records, the impact on the management of dental caries of new caries risk assessment (CRA) forms and procedures introduced into a predoctoral dental school clinic. Of 3,659 patients with a new patient visit (NPV) and baseline exam (BE) in the two-year period of July 2003 through June 2005, 69 percent (n= 2,516) had a baseline CRA. "Visible cavitation or caries into dentin by radiograph" was significantly correlated to most items included in the CRA form, for example, "frequent between meal snack of sugars/cooked starch" (p<0.001), "inadequate saliva flow" (p=0.03), and "deep pits and fissures or developmental defects" (p<0.001). Fluoride toothpaste use (odds ratio, OR=0.7) was negatively related to cavitation risk while "readily visible heavy plaque on teeth" (OR=2.0), "frequent between meal snack of sugars/cooked starch" (OR=1.6), "interproximal enamel lesions or radiolucencies" (OR=11.8), and "white spots or occlusal discoloration" (OR=1.50) were positively related. CRA use at follow-up, the use of bacterial tests, antibacterial therapy, and specific patient recommendations were all very low. While the content and usefulness of the CRA procedures were validated, the study highlighted the difficulties of implementing such programs in educational establishments even with an extensive student didactic program and faculty training.

No abstract

Croatian dentists tend to restore approximal caries lesions when the lesions are confined to the enamel and their development can still be arrested.

Disparities among dental schools concerning the teaching and practice of cariology and operative dentistry can lead to variations in students' treatment modalities that can have health and economic consequences for patients and third party providers. The purpose of this study was to assess caries management strategies taught in French dental schools employing a questionnaire used in a previous study involving private dentists. The study population consisted of 180 teachers of operative dentistry. Each teacher received a questionnaire and a reply-paid envelope. The questionnaire assessed their treatment strategies, knowledge and beliefs about selected aspects of diagnosis, and treatment of dental caries. After one reminder, the response rate was 49.1 percent. The results illustrate a wide disparity among French teachers concerning restorative treatment thresholds for approximal surfaces, opinions about the rate of caries progression, and the need to monitor lesions near the DEJ. The teachers' attitudes differed from those of private practitioners: they tended to intervene surgically at a later stage, but they would intervene earlier in the treatment of the carious process than would Scandinavian dentists. This study may help in encouraging dental faculties to develop a consensus on issues related to diagnosis and management of dental caries.Dr.