Background The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for people with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months’ trastuzumab, tested in registration trials, was adopted as standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently, similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks of trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority. Objectives To establish whether or not 6 months’ adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months’ in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary end point of 4-year disease-free survival. Design This was a Phase III randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Setting The setting was 152 NHS hospitals. Participants A total of 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who it was planned would receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab took part. Intervention Randomisation (1 : 1) to 6 months’ or 12 months’ trastuzumab treatment. Main outcomes The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were overall survival, cost-effectiveness and cardiac function during treatment with trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 80% with 12 months’ trastuzumab, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6 months’ trastuzumab (5% one-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using a within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model. Results Between 4 October 2007 and 31 July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12 months’ trastuzumab and 2043 were randomised to 6 months’ trastuzumab. Sixty-nine per cent of patients had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% received trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; and 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years’ median follow-up, with 389 (10%) deaths and 566 (14%) disease-free survival events, the 4-year disease-free survival rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 88.1% to 90.8%) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% confidence interval 88.9% to 91.5%) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1.10, 90% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.26; non-inferiority p = 0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6 months’ trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for overall survival (non-inferiority p = 0.0003) and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab [non-inferiority p = 0.03 (disease-free-survival) and p = 0.006 (overall survival)]. Six months’ trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade [365/1929 (19%) vs. 460/1935 (24%) for 12-month patients; p = 0.0003] or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity [61/1977 (3%) vs. 146/1941 (8%) for 12-month patients; p < 0.0001]. Health economic analysis showed that 6 months’ trastuzumab resulted in significantly lower lifetime costs than and similar lifetime quality-adjusted life-years to 12 months’ trastuzumab, and thus there is a high probability that 6 months’ trastuzumab is cost-effective compared with 12 months’ trastuzumab. Patient-reported experiences in the trial highlighted fatigue and aches and pains most frequently. Limitations The type of chemotherapy and timing of trastuzumab changed during the recruitment phase of the study as standard practice altered. Conclusions PERSEPHONE demonstrated that, in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, 6 months’ adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months’. Six months’ treatment resulted in significantly less cardiac toxicity and fewer severe adverse events. Future work Ongoing translational work investigates patient and tumour genetic determinants of toxicity, and trastuzumab efficacy. An individual patient data meta-analysis with PHARE and other trastuzumab duration trials is planned. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52968807, EudraCT 2006-007018-39 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712140. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Objective It is well established that exercise and lifestyle behaviours improve men's health outcomes from prostate cancer. With 3.8 million men living with the disease worldwide, the challenge is creating accessible intervention approaches that lead to sustainable lifestyle changes. We carried out a phase II feasibility study of a lifestyle intervention delivered by nine community pharmacies in the United Kingdom to inform a larger efficacy study. Qualitative interviews explored how men experienced the intervention, and these data are presented here. Methods Community pharmacies delivered a multicomponent lifestyle intervention to 116 men with prostate cancer. The intervention included a health, strength, and fitness assessment, immediate feedback, lifestyle prescription with telephone support, and reassessment 12 weeks later. Three months after receiving the intervention, 33 participants took part in semistructured telephone interviews. Results Our framework analysis identified how a teachable moment can be created by a community pharmacy intervention. There was evidence of this when men's self‐perception was challenged and coupled to a positive interaction with a pharmacist. Our findings highlight the social context of behaviour change with men identifying how their lifestyle choices were negotiated within their household. There was a ripple effect as lifestyle behaviours made a positive impact on friends and family. Conclusions The teachable moment is not a serendipitous opportunity but can be created by an intervention. Our study adds insight into how community pharmacists can support cancer survivors to make positive lifestyle behaviour changes and suggests a role for doing rather than just telling.

Objective This research took a co‐design approach to develop a social intervention to support people affected by a cancer diagnosis to be physically active. Methods We conducted semi‐structured interviews with five key stakeholder groups: (1) adults with a recent breast or prostate cancer diagnosis; (2) family and friends of cancer patients; (3) healthcare professionals; (4) physical activity providers; and (5) cancer charity representatives. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes in the data. We then worked with a subset of participants to co‐develop the intervention. Results Participants welcomed the idea of a social approach to a physical activity intervention. Input was received on the timing and format of delivery, how to communicate about physical activity to cancer patients and their family and friends and the types of physical activity that would be appropriate. Our findings suggest that interventions need to be flexible in terms of timing and delivery and offer a wide range of physical activity options. These findings directly informed the co‐development of ‘All Together Active’. Conclusion All Together Active is designed to support cancer patients and their family and friends to be active throughout treatment and beyond, benefiting their physical and mental health.

TPS615 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) results in eradication of cancer in the axillary nodes in 40-70% of patients. This raises questions about the benefit of further axillary treatment in patients with no evidence of residual nodal disease (ypN0) post NACT. Methods: Design: ATNEC is a phase 3, randomized (1:1), multi-center UK trial, with embedded economic evaluation. Patients with proven axillary node metastases on needle biopsy receive NACT followed by sentinel node biopsy (SNB). If the sentinel nodes have converted to benign (ypN0), ATNEC randomly assigns patients to axillary treatment (nodal radiotherapy [ART] or axillary nodal clearance [ALND]) vs no further axillary treatment. Stratification: Institution, type of surgery (breast conserving surgery vs mastectomy), receptor status (triple negative vs HER2 positive vs ER positive and/or PR positive and HER2 negative).Inclusion criteria: Age ≥ 18; Male or female; T1-3N1M0 breast cancer at diagnosis (pre-NACT); FNA or core biopsy confirmed axillary nodal metastases at presentation; ER and HER2 status evaluated on primary tumor; Received standard NACT as per local guidelines; Imaging of the axilla to assess response to NACT;Dual tracer SNB post-NACT and at least 3 nodes removed (sentinel nodes and marked node): If a single tracer is used, the patient is eligible if the involved node is marked pre-NACT and at least 3 nodes removed (including the marked node), If axillary node sampling is performed following failed localization of sentinel nodes, patient is eligible if at least 3 nodes removed (including the marked node), If node is not marked, or marked node is not removed, patient is eligible if the histology report shows evidence of down-staging with complete pathological response in at least one node and at least 3 nodes removed; No evidence of nodal metastases post NACT (ypN0). Exclusion criteria: Bilateral invasive breast cancer; SNB prior to NACT; Previous ipsilateral axillary nodal surgery; Previous cancer within last 5 years or concomitant malignancy. Aims: To assess whether omitting further axillary treatment (ALND & ART) for patients with early-stage breast cancer and axillary nodal metastases on needle biopsy - who after NACT have no residual nodal disease on SNB (ypN0) - is non-inferior to axillary treatment in terms of disease-free survival, and reduces lymphoedema at 5 years. Statistical methods: All analyses will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis to preserve randomization, avoid bias from exclusions and preserve statistical power. Radiotherapy Quality Assurance: Study has in-built radiotherapy QA program that will be coordinated by National Radiotherapy Trials QA (RTTQA) group. Target accrual: 1,900 Status: Recruiting. As of 11-Feb-2022, 39 sites open, 87 patients enrolled, 31 randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT04109079.

No abstract