Objectives: We provide the first evaluation of the CE-IVD marked Novodiag® stool parasites assay (NVD), allowing rapid and high-plex detection of 26 distinct targets, encompassing protozoans, helminths and microsporidia in stool samples. Methods: A total of 254 samples (n = 205 patients) were prospectively processed by the NVD and our routine procedure (RP). Performances of the NVD were compared with RP. Samples only positive by the NVD assay were investigated by external PCR assays. Sensitivity and specificity (Se/Sp) and time from sample receipt to results were determined for each method. The NVD was also evaluated against 77 additional samples positive for a wide range of parasites. Results: Overall positivity rate was 16.9% for RP compared with 34% using the NVD assay, and 164 samples (66%) were negative by both methods. Only 30 positive samples (12%) showed full concordance between RP and NVD. Fifty-three discordant samples were sent for external investigations. Except for Giardia intestinalis and Trichuris spp., higher Se was observed for the NVD assay for Blastocystis spp. (100% vs. 63%), Dientamoeba fragilis (100% vs. 0%), Schistosoma spp. (100% vs. 17%), and Enterobius vermicularis (100% vs. 67%) but roughly similar to RP for the remaining parasites tested. False-positive results were identified for Blastocystis spp., G. intestinalis, and Trichuris spp. using the NVD assay. The NVD mostly provides a diagnosis on the day of sample receipt compared with a mean of three days with RP. Conclusions: Besides some limitations, the NVD is a new diagnostic strategy allowing rapid and high-plex detection of gastrointestinal parasites from unpreserved stools.

No abstract

Introduction Candida parapsilosis is both a commensal/saprophytic yeast of the human skin and an opportunistic pathogen which can be responsible for life-threatening infections. The increasing reports of clonal outbreaks involving azole-resistant C. parapsilosis in the clinical setting is worrisome and urges for a better understanding of antifungal resistance in this species. Previous studies have identified mutations in key genes which can explain acquired fluconazole resistance. Reverse genetics approaches are now warranted to confirm their involvement and to determine whether they can affect other clinically-licensed antifungals. Here, we used a CRISPR-Cas9 technique to study the relative contributions of clinically-derived mutations to antifungal resistance and provide answers to these questions. Materials and Methods Six clinically-derived mutations were selected (ERG11Y132F, ERG11K143R,ERG11R398I, TAC1G650E, MRR1G583R, ERG3G111R) to be engineered in two C. parapsilosis fluconazole-susceptible backgrounds (ATCC22019, STZ5) using a previously described CRISPR-Cas9 method. In vitro susceptibility of the transformants to fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole and micafungin was determined by Etest®. Results/Discussion The impact on fluconazole susceptibility was highly variable depending on the residue/gene involved, but roughly similar between the two genetic backgrounds. All but two(ERG11R398I, ERG3G111R) conferred fluconazole resistance, though the highest MIC increase was observed for MRR1G583R (≥650 fold). As expected in a diploid species, we noted an impact of allelic dosage. Some kind of cross-resistance to the other azoles was noted from some mutations, although the impact was lower for posaconazole and isavuconazole, except for MRR1G583R which led to multi-azole resistance. Finally, ERG3G111R increased tolerance to both azoles and echinocandins.