The phenomenon of conflict among students that have occurred recently raises several questions. Is this conflict in accordance with the specific factors of each case or has certain socio-cultural roots. If that so, why do conflicts occur more often against certain areas. Why does the conflict always recur even though reconciliation has been carried out every time the conflict occurs. This research has some purposes: firstly, finding out the social and cultural roots of conflict among Bone and Luwu students. Secondly; finding how to handle regional conflicts among students. This research is descriptive qualitative by using knowledge geneaology approach from Michel Foucault. Research data obtained through observation, in-depth interviews and documentations. The results showed that a) the phenomenon of conflict among Bone and Luwu students had socio-cultural roots that were produced in the form of internal knowledge from generation to generation. The birth of the local organization of commissariat on campus marked a period of significant discontinuity producing inter-regional conflict. In addition, the functional of regional organizations as regeneration spaces that perpetuate fanaticism; b) regional organizations need to encourage an inclusive regeneration curriculum. In addition, it is very important to carry out social and spatial engineering that allows inclusive activities to live on campus by strengthening student institutions.

The problem of terrorism in Indonesia is clearly troubling all circles to any social aspect. Efforts made by the government are still predominantly spontaneous and repressive. Besides, the explanation of social theory in explaining terror behavior in Indonesia is still not able to provide a broad and in-depth insight, so this problem has solved on the phenomena that appear on the surface only. Therefore, it is important to find a complex theoretical explanation that can be overcome to the root. The focus of the study is to analyze how the social reproduction of terror behavior in Indonesia with the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. The descriptive method with a qualitative approach was used in this research. The method of data collection is done by using observation, interview and documentation techniques. The results of this study show that terror behavior in Indonesia is an inner thought that lasts for quite a long time. The practice of terror does not happen instantly due to a certain momentum reaction. The reproduction of the terror behavior practice indicates the existence of a well-maintained habitus in the community. Their struggle is also inseparable from the existence of social capital and economic capital for the actors. Religious tendencies are used as a media that is considered appropriate to perpetuate the socialization process.