IMPORTANCETruncating variants in the gene encoding filamin C (FLNCtv) are associated with arrhythmogenic and dilated cardiomyopathies with a reportedly high risk of ventricular arrhythmia.OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of and risk factors associated with adverse events among FLNCtv carriers compared with individuals carrying TTN truncating variants (TTNtv). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cohort study recruited 167 consecutive FLNCtv carriers and a control cohort of 244 patients with TTNtv matched for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 19 European cardiomyopathy referral units between 1990 and 2018. Data analyses were conducted between June and October, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end point was a composite of malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) (sudden cardiac death, aborted sudden cardiac death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, and sustained ventricular tachycardia) and end-stage heart failure (heart transplant or mortality associated with end-stage heart failure). The secondary end point comprised MVA events only. RESULTSIn total, 167 patients with FLNCtv were studied (55 probands [33%]; 89 men [53%]; mean [SD] age at baseline evaluation, 43 [18] years). For a median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range, 7-60 months), 29 patients (17.4%) reached the primary end point (19 patients with MVA and 10 patients with end-stage heart failure). Eight (44%) arrhythmic events occurred among individuals with baseline mild to moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (LVEF = 36%-49%). Univariable risk factors associated with the primary end point included proband status, LVEF decrement per 10%, ventricular ectopy (Ն500 in 24 hours) and myocardial fibrosis detected on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The LVEF decrement (hazard ratio [HR] per 10%, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.30-2.57]; P < .001) and proband status (HR, 3.18 [95% CI, 1.12-9.04]; P = .03) remained independent risk factors on multivariable analysis (excluding myocardial fibrosis and ventricular ectopy owing to case censoring). There was no difference in freedom from MVA between FLNCtv carriers with mild to moderate or severe (LVEF Յ35%) LVSD (HR, 1.29 [95% CI,]; P = .64). Carriers of FLNCtv with impaired LVEF at baseline evaluation (n = 69) had reduced freedom from MVA compared with 244 TTNtv carriers with similar baseline LVEF (for mild to moderate LVSD: HR, 16.41 [95% CI,]; P < .001; for severe LVSD: HR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.04-5.87]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe high frequency of MVA among patients with FLNCtv with mild to moderate LVSD suggests that higher LVEF values than those currently recommended should be considered for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in FLNCtv carriers.

Background: It was the aim to investigate the frequency and genetic basis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) among relatives of index patients with unexplained heart failure at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Clinical investigations were performed in 109 DCM index patients and 445 of their relatives. All index patients underwent genetic investigations of 76 disease-associated DCM genes. A family history of DCM occurred in 11% (n=12) while clinical investigations identified familial DCM in a total of 32% (n=35). One-fifth of all relatives (n=95) had DCM of whom 60% (n=57) had symptoms of heart failure at diagnosis, whereas 40% (n=38) were asymptomatic. Symptomatic relatives had a shorter event-free survival than asymptomatic DCM relatives ( P <0.001). Results: Genetic investigations identified 43 pathogenic (n=27) or likely pathogenic (n=16) variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology criteria. Forty-four percent (n=48/109) of index patients carried a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant of whom 36% (n=27/74) had sporadic DCM, whereas 60% (21/35) were familial cases. Thirteen of the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were also present in ≥7 affected individuals and thereby considered to be of sufficient high confidence for use in predictive genetic testing. Conclusions: A family history of DCM identified only 34% (n=12/35) of hereditary DCM, whereas systematic clinical screening identified the remaining 66% (n=23) of DCM families. This emphasized the importance of clinical investigations to identify familial DCM. The high number of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in familial DCM provides a firm basis for offering genetic investigations in affected families. This should also be considered in sporadic cases since adequate family evaluation may not always be possible and the results of the genetic investigations may carry prognostic information with an impact on individual management.

No abstract

No abstract