Due
to their enhanced fuel economy, the market share of gasoline
direct injection (GDI) vehicles has increased significantly over the
past decade. However, GDI engines emit higher levels of black carbon
(BC) aerosols compared to traditional port fuel injection (PFI) engines.
Here, we performed coupled chemical transport and radiative transfer
simulations to estimate the aerosol-induced public health and direct
radiative effects of shifting the U.S. fleet from PFI to GDI technology.
By comparing simulations with current emission profiles and emission
profiles modified to reflect a shift from PFI to GDI, we calculated
the change in aerosol (mostly BC) concentrations associated with the
fleet change. Standard concentration-response calculations indicated
that the total annual deaths in the U.S. attributed to particulate
gasoline-vehicle emissions would increase from 855 to 1599 due to
shifting from PFI to GDI. Furthermore, the increase in BC associated
with the shift would lead to an annual average positive radiative
effect over the U.S. of approximately +0.075 W/m2, with
values as large as +0.45 W/m2 over urban regions. On the
other hand, the reduction in CO2 emissions associated with
the enhanced fuel economy of GDI vehicles would yield a globally uniform
negative radiative effect, estimated to be −0.013 W/m2 over a 20 year time horizon. Therefore, the climate burden of the
increase in BC emissions dominates over the U.S., especially over
source regions.
The month of August 2015 featured extensive wildfires in the Northwestern U.S. and no significant fires in Alaska and Canada. With the majority of carbonaceous aerosols (CA), including black carbon...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.