Objectives COVID-19 has infected millions of people across the globe, leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths. Currently, there are no vaccines available for COVID-19, and the most effective way to curb its spread is to follow preventive practices. The present study aimed to assess the extent of adoption of preventive practices among the general population in India. Methods A web-based cross-sectional survey was carried out recruiting 964 participants from all over India through purposive sampling. A pre-validated questionnaire consisting of 37 questions was used to collect data. Items 1A to 18A covered various preventive practices and items 1B to 19B covered reasons for not following those preventive practices. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. Results Most participants reported taking precautions such as wearing masks (91.80%), covering both nose and mouth (79.14%) and avoiding hand shaking (83.40%). However, practices like following social distancing in public places (51.76%) and workplace (51.04%), frequent hand washing/sanitising (63.59%) and washing hands for at least 20 seconds (45.44%) were less commonly observed. Participants failed to follow social distancing because of overcrowding and lack of space. They also found it cumbersome to wash hands multiple times. Female participants and people residing in metropolitan and small cities were fairly doing well in following preventive practices. Conclusion The study helped in identifying the glitches in following various preventive practices against COVID-19 during unlock phase and reasons for the failure to perform these practices.

Background and aim This study explored the association between BMI and COVID-19 positive status in a tertiary care hospital from New Delhi. Methods Three hundred and seventy nine adult patients who presented to COVID-19 screening outpatient department of the hospital were interviewed over the phone regarding their body weight and height. The COVID-19 RT-PCR report of the patients was extracted from the hospital information system. Results The mean BMI and the prevalence of obesity was observed to be higher in individuals who were detected to be COVID-19 RT-PCR positive as compared to those who were negative. With every one-unit increment in BMI above 23 kg/m 2 , the odds of being COVID-19 positive increased by 1.8 times among these patients. Conclusion The findings suggest a dose-response association between BMI and the odds of COVID-19 infection in individuals with excess weight.

Background Preventive practices are the mainstay to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. We tried to assess the self-reported adherence of our participants to the already known preventive practices. Furthermore, we tried to determine whether the non-compliance to specific preventive practices was associated with the acquisition of the infection or not. Methods We enrolled 379 healthcare workers, hospital staff, and their family members who were tested for COVID-19 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in an outpatient clinic. Socio-demography and the infection prevention practices of the individuals were recorded in a preformed questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed to find out the statistical association between these factors and the RT-PCR results. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios were determined to find out the degree of protection provided by each of the preventive practices concerning the development of the disease. Results Social distancing (p<0.001), hand hygiene (p<0.001), ensuring N-95 mask fit check (p<0.001), and the use of alternative medications (p=0.002) were found to be protective. Resident doctors were at a lower risk of developing the disease as compared to the other healthcare workers (odds ratio: 0.39). Conclusion The failure to practice the already known preventive practices is probably one of the most important factors in the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic. Adherence to these practices is the intervention of choice to reduce disease transmission in the current scenario.

Background and Aims: Post-spinal anaesthesia hypotension (PSH) is common and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) and carotid artery peak systolic velocity variations (CAPVV) are two widely used parameters for assessing the volume status of critically ill patients which have also been investigated as predictors of PSH and hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IVCCI and CAPVV as predictors of PSH. Methods: A total of 50 patients aged between 18 and 65 years undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were included. The IVCCI and CAPVV were measured using ultrasound pre-operatively. After administering spinal anaesthesia, haemodynamic data were collected till 15 min. Our primary objective was to evaluate the role of IVCCI and CAPVV to predict PSH. The secondary objectives were to compare the predictive efficacy of these two parameters and to detect other parameters for predicting PSH. We constructed the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for IVCCI and CAPVV and obtained the best cut-off values. Results: The PSH occurred in 34% of the patients. IVCCI >21.15 could predict PSH with 58.8% sensitivity and 69.7% specificity. CAPVV >18.33 predicted PSH with 70.6% sensitivity and 54.6% specificity and IVC max/IVCCI >60 could predict PSH with 58.8% sensitivity and 54.5% specificity. A composite model comprising IVCmax (maximum IVC diameter), CAPVV, and baseline mean blood pressure was able to predict PSH. Conclusion: Both IVCCI and CAPVV have poor diagnostic accuracy in predicting PSH in adult patients undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgery.