The therapeutic landscape of several genitourinary malignancies has been revolutionized by the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, the utility of immunotherapies in prostate cancer has been limited, partly due to the immunologically “cold” tumor terrain of prostate cancer. As of today, pembrolizumab is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in a select group of patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), deficient mismatch repair (dMMR), or high tumor mutational burden (TMB). Looking ahead, several combinatorial approaches with ICIs involving radioligands, radiotherapy, PARP inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors, and cancer vaccines are exploring a potential synergistic effect. Furthermore, B7-H3 is an alternative checkpoint that may hold promise in adding to the treatment landscape of mCRPC. This review aims to summarize previous monotherapy and combination therapy trials of ICIs as well as novel immunotherapy combination therapeutic strategies and treatment targets in mCRPC.

Background: African American men are much more likely than Caucasian men to be diagnosed with and to die of prostate cancer. Genetic differences likely play a role.The cBioPortal database reveals that African American men with prostate cancer have higher rates of CDK12 somatic mutations compared to Caucasian men. However, this does not account for prior prostate cancer treatments, which are particularly important in the castrate-resistant setting. We aimed to compare somatic mutations based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between African American and Caucasian men after exposure to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide.Methods: This single-institution retrospective study characterizes the somatic mutations detected on ctDNA for African American and Caucasian men with mCRPC who had progressed after abiraterone and/or enzalutamide from 2015 through 2022. We evaluated the gene mutations and types of mutations in this mCRPC cohort.Results: There were 50 African American and 200 Caucasian men with CRPC with available ctDNA data. African American men were younger at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.008) and development of castration resistance (p = 0.006). African American men were more likely than Caucasian men to have pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/ LP) mutations in CDK12 (12% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.003) and copy number amplifications

721 Background: Current methodologies for monitoring treatment response are largely based on conventional scans and/or tumor biopsies, which may be limited in their ability to accurately assess disease burden at the molecular level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in blood has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker and has shown to better assess treatment response in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We conducted a prospective, pilot study to investigate the concordance of serial ctDNA detection and dynamics with radiographic response in patients with advanced GU malignancies undergoing ICI-based treatment. Methods: Twenty patients with histologically confirmed advanced GU malignancies (renal, urothelial, and prostate) were enrolled in the prospective study. All eligible patients received ICI treatment for at least 12 weeks and were followed by serial collection of blood samples every 6-8 weeks until disease progression. Conventional scans were performed approximately every 12 weeks until disease progression. Overall response rate (ORR) by investigator was reported and associated with ctDNA detection. Results: ctDNA analysis was performed on 122 plasma samples obtained from 20 patients (N=15 renal cell carcinoma; N=4 urothelial carcinoma; N=1 prostate cancer). Prior therapies to ICI-based treatment included chemotherapy (10%), hormonal therapy (5%) and anti-VEGF (5%). After study enrollment, patients received anti-PD-1 (95%), anti-CTLA-4 (30%) or anti-PD-L1 (5%) with an ORR of 70% as best response. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range: 4-48), progressive disease was observed in 7 patients. Nineteen patients had longitudinal plasma samples available and ctDNA detection at any time point was 45% (9/20). The overall concordance between ctDNA dynamics and radiographic response at 12 weeks was observed in 89% (17/19) of patients. Of these 17 concordant patients, one patient showed transient ctDNA positivity followed by clearance at the last two timepoints on treatment. The two patients with discordant results included the ones with CNS-only metastasis (ctDNA negative). Of the 7 patients who progressed on ICI, ctDNA was detected in five (71%); the remaining two had CNS-only metastases. The last patient had a single time point available on treatment that showed ctDNA-positivity and passed away 7 weeks after molecular evidence of disease. Conclusions: In this study, serial collection of blood samples for ctDNA analysis to monitor response to ICI-based therapiesin patients with advanced GU tumors was feasible. There was a high concordance rate between radiological imaging and ctDNA data, especially in extra-CNS disease. Further studies are needed to validate ctDNA as a tool to aid disease monitoring in patients treated with ICI.

243 Background: Lutetium-177- PSMA-617 (Lu-177) is a radioligand therapy that delivers radiation to PSMA-expressing cells in patients with advanced prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to analyze ctDNA in responders and non-responders after Lu-177 treatments. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected on 31 heavily pre-treated metastatic CRPC patients who received Lu-177 treatment at Tulane Cancer Center. All patients fulfilled VISION criteria for treatment and all had ctDNA assessment with Guardant 360 within 30 days prior to first treatment with Lu-177. Of the 31 patients, 7 had paired ctDNA assessment both prior initiation of treatment and at the end of treatment. Clinical data such as PSA response (PSA decline 50% or more) to Lu-177, initial diagnosis, pathology, treatment history, and relevant germline genetic data were collected. Results: Of the 31 patients who received Lu-177 treatment, 18 had PSA response to Lu-177 (responders) and 13 did not (non-responders). In ctDNA mutational analyses, there were no significant differences detected prior to treatment between responders and non-responders. There was, however, a significant increase in the presence of copy number amplifications in non-responders (n= 11/13) when compared to responders (n= 7/18) (OR= 8.64, 95% C.I. [1.46, 51.25)], p = 0.0250). Amplification was detected in 10 genes in non-responders, whereas responders only had amplifications in AR (7/18) and EGFR (1/18). The most frequently amplified genes in non-responders were AR (8/13), CCNE1 (6/13), EGFR (4/13), and FGFR1 (4/13). Furthermore, in analysis of the 7 patients with paired ctDNA assessments, amplifications increased during treatment with Lu-177. Conclusions: Radioligand therapy with Lu-177 has been shown to prolong life and reduce disease progression. Our analysis of the cohort of Lu-177 treated patients showed that the presence of gene amplifications in ctDNA may play a role in predicting resistance to treatment with Lu-177.

248 Background: mCRPC patients with liver metastases have a poor prognosis and often progress rapidly on a variety of treatments. Previously, preliminary ctDNA analyses of mCRPC patients with liver metastases showed a range of commonly altered genes in patients with liver metastases (Ranasinghe et al; 2019). In this follow-up, we evaluated ctDNA alterations in an expanded cohort of mCRPC patients with liver metastases. Methods: From Tulane Cancer Center, retrospective review of mCRPC patients was used to identify patients with confirmed liver metastasis. All liver metastases were confirmed based on imaging data. All patients included had ctDNA evaluated with a multi-gene cancer panel via Guardant 360 assay (Guardant Health, Inc). Additional clinical annotation including family history, germline testing, staging, imaging, and laboratory values. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher’s Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Results: 158 mCRPC patients with appropriate diagnostic imaging as well as ctDNA testing. From this group, 8% (n= 12) had confirmed liver metastases. Among the patients with liver metastasis, the most common alterations detected were in AR (50%; 6/12) and PIK3CA (25%; 3/12). Patients with liver metastasis were more likely to have amplifications in FGFR1 detected in their ctDNA (OR= 14.40; 95% C.I. (1.83, 113.22); p= 0.03). In addition to ctDNA, germline data was assessed, and it was found that patients with liver metastasis were more likely to have a pathogenic germline mutation (OR= 7.61; 95% C.I. (2.85, 20.31); p<.0001). The most common germline mutations detected in patients with liver metastasis were in BRCA2 (n= 3) and TP53 (n= 2). Conclusions: Though liver metastasis are less common in prostate cancer, it often occurs following extensive treatment and results in a poor prognosis for patients. In patients with liver metastasis, FGFR1 amplification was more often detected in ctDNA. Importantly, patients with liver metastasis were significantly more likely to have a pathogenic germline alteration.