Loading response challenges the limb with the dual demands of accepting rapidly moving body weight to both absorb the shock of floor contact and create a stable limb over which the body can advance. Delay in achieving foot flat contact with the floor causes a prolonged period of heel only support and results in an unstable base of support for those persons with transtibial amputations. The purpose of this study was to identify mechanical causes of instability during weight acceptance with three different prosthetic foot designs, Single Axis, Seattle Lightfoot, and Flex Foot. Ten male individuals with transtibial amputations were tested on three separate occasions wearing each prosthetic foot. A comparison group of ten individuals without transtibial amputations was also examined. Mean free walking speed was significantly slower for those with transtibial amputations regardless of the prosthetic foot worn (p < 0:05). Contralateral toe off times were significantly later for each prosthetic foot (p < 0:01). The timing of peak knee flexion was found to be significantly later than normal for each prosthetic foot (p < 0:01). To minimize the impact of initial floor contact, persons with an intact limb used rapid plantar flexion, followed by a slower lowering of the foot to the floor. Dorsiflexion then stimulated knee flexion and foot flat. Two altered functions were found for all three prosthetic feet, reduced knee flexion and prolonged heel only support. Diminished knee flexion reflected delayed dorsiflexion and tibial advancement as a result of the cushioned heel. Lateness in reaching foot flat was also found. To improve the walking abilities of those persons with transtibial amputations, prosthetic foot designs need to incorporate mechanisms which promote early foot flat while preserving limb stability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.