No abstract

Groin hernias are the commonest abdominal wall hernias; these hernias are known to develop various complications. Strangulation is a serious and life-threatening complication. Various surgical procedures like primary tissue repair, mesh repair, keep open with secondary repair, etc. are in practice for strangulated groin hernias. Postoperative infection and recurrence are the main concerns with these procedures. The aim of conducting this study was to compare the outcomes of the mesh hernioplasty with Desarda's purely tissue hernioplasty in the treatment of strangulated inguinal hernia. A total of one hundred and twenty-four patients were included in the study. These patients were grouped into group A (mesh hernioplasty group) and group B (Desarda's tissue repair group) and randomization was done. Results of these two techniques were compared with respect to post-operative seroma, surgical site infection, recurrence, and chronic pain. Seroma formation was more in group A, which accounts for 35.48%( 22) of patients than in group B patients accounts for 19.35%(12). Operative site infection was more in group A, which accounts for 35.48%(22) patients than in group B 9.67%(6) patients. Recurrence was more in Group A patients which accounts for 22.58%(14) than in Group B patients which accounts for 3.22%(2). More patients account for 19.35%(12) in group A experienced chronic pain than the patients 1.61%(1) in Group B. The current study showed that Desarda's technique is a safe, effective, and single-sitting technique with a significantly reduced risk of seroma, surgical site infection, chronic pain, and recurrence than mesh hernioplasty for strangulated inguinal hernia.

No abstract

Introduction. Ventral hernias are the second most common hernia; Onlay and Sublay operating techniques are procedures commonly performed in such cases. There is no consensus on the superiority of these procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the results of both procedures in order to identify the recommended technique between the two options. Materials and Methods. A total of 106 patients with epigastric, umbilical, paraumbilical, incisional hernias were studied. These patients were grouped into group A (onlay) and Group B (sublay). The outcomes of the two techniques were compared with respect to operative time, pain, hospital stay, seroma, infection, recurrence and patient satisfaction. Results. The mean operative time was 81.30 minutes in group A, and 85.85minutes in group B. Twenty-two (42.5%) patients in group A and seven (12.96%) patients in group B developed seroma. Nine (17.3%) patients in group A, 3 (5.55%) patients in group B developed post-operative infection. 30 (57.69%) patients in group A and 47(87.3%) patients in group B reported moderate pain, whereas three (5.76 %) and seven (12.96%) patients in group A and group B were reported severe pain in immediate post-operative period. At 48 hours, 20 (38.46%) and 24 (44.44%) of patients in group A and B were reported moderate pain, whereas 32 (61.53%) and 30 (55.55%) patients in group A and B reported mild pain. The mean hospital stay was 10.11 days in group A and 6.22 in group B. Three (5.76 %) patients of group A has recurrence, none of the patients in sublay group has developed recurrence. Thirty-nine (72.22%) patients of sublay group expressed their satisfaction but only 20(38.46%) patients in onlay group expressed their satisfaction. Conclusion. With reference to all the study parameters except one, the sub lay technique of mesh placement appears to be better. The exception is pain in the immediate postoperative period.