The aetiological agents responsible for, and the outcome of, acute liver failure were investigated prospectively in 44 children (29 males, 15 females) attending a tertiary health care facility in India. The children were between the ages of 2 months and 13 years. Studies for viral infections and other etiologies could be carried out in 40 patients. Specific aetiological labels were possible in 35 (87.5%) patients. Thirty (75%) had evidence of acute viral hepatitis. Acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection was found in a total of 18 children, with hepatitis A (HAV) in 16, hepatitis B in 5, and C in 1. Seven had isolated infection with hepatitis E, five with A, and four with B. Nine had both E and A infection. Superinfection of HEV was observed in a child with Indian childhood cirrhosis (ICC). Acute HEV infection was confirmed by immunoblot assay in all the patients and in eight of these, HEV-RNA was also detected in the serum. HAV was involved in 37.5% of cases with isolated infection in 10% (4 of 40). The aetiological factors associated with acute liver failure, apart from HAV and HEV, were other hepatotropic viruses (22.5%), Wilson's disease (5%), ICC (5%), and hepatotoxic drugs (7.5%). In five patients, no serological evidence of acute viral hepatitis could be found, neither did the metabolic screen yield any result. It was observed that enterically transmitted hepatitis viruses (HAV and HEV) were associated with 60% of acute hepatic failure in children. Mixed infection of HAV and HEV formed the single largest aetiological subgroup. In developing countries, where hepatitis A and E infections are endemic, severe complications can arise in the case of mixed infection. This may contribute to most of the mortality from acute liver failure during childhood.
Background
Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal symptoms, primarily attributed to sensitization of somatosensory system carrying pain. Few reports have investigated the impact of fibromyalgia symptoms on cognition, corticomotor excitability, sleepiness, and the sleep quality — all of which can deteriorate the quality of life in fibromyalgia. However, the existing reports are underpowered and have conflicting directions of findings, limiting their generalizability. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare measures of cognition, corticomotor excitability, sleepiness, and sleep quality using standardized instruments in the recruited patients of fibromyalgia with pain-free controls.
Methods
Diagnosed cases of fibromyalgia were recruited from the Rheumatology department for the cross-sectional, case-control study. Cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, Stroop color-word task), corticomotor excitability (Resting motor threshold, Motor evoked potential amplitude), daytime sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) were studied according to the standard procedure.
Results
Thirty-four patients of fibromyalgia and 30 pain-free controls were recruited for the study. Patients of fibromyalgia showed decreased cognitive scores (p = 0.05), lowered accuracy in Stroop color-word task (for color: 0.02, for word: 0.01), and prolonged reaction time (< 0.01, < 0.01). Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients were found (< 0.01) and worsened sleep quality (< 0.01) were found. Parameters of corticomotor excitability were comparable between patients of fibromyalgia and pain-free controls.
Conclusions
Patients of fibromyalgia made more errors, had significantly increased reaction time for cognitive tasks, marked daytime sleepiness, and impaired quality of sleep. Future treatment strategies may include cognitive deficits and sleep disturbances as an integral part of fibromyalgia management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.