BACKGROUND: The capability of the public ambulance system in Ukraine to address urgent medical complaints in a prehospital environment is unknown. Evaluation using reliable sources of patient data is needed to provide insight into current treatments and outcomes. METHODS: We obtained access to de-identifi ed computer records from the emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch center in Poltava, a medium-sized city in central Ukraine. Covering a fi vemonth period, we retrieved data for urgent calls with a patient complaint of respiratory distress. We evaluated ambulance response and treatment times, field diagnoses, and patient disposition, and analyzed factors related to fatal outcomes. RESULTS: Over the fi ve-month period of the study, 2,029 urgent calls for respiratory distress were made to the Poltava EMS dispatch center. A physician-led ambulance typically responded within 10 minutes. Seventy-seven percent of patients were treated and released, twenty percent were taken to hospital, and three percent died in the prehospital phase. On univariate analysis, age over 60 and altered mental status at the time of the call were strongly associated with a fatal outcome. CONCLUSION: The EMS dispatch center in a medium-sized city in Ukraine has adequate organizational infrastructure to ensure that a physician-led public ambulance responds rapidly to complaints of respiratory distress. That EMS system was able to manage most patients without requiring hospital admission. However, a prehospital fatality rate of three percent suggests that further research is warranted to determine training, equipment, or procedural needs of the public ambulance system to manage urgent medical conditions.

Introduction:Current methods to evaluate the delivery of urgent prehospital care often rely on inadequate surrogate measures or unreliable self-reported data. A workplace-based strategy may be feasible to assess the delivery of prehospital care by ambulances in selected populations.Aim:To perform a nationwide assessment of the psychomotor performance of public ambulance workers in Ukraine, we created a plan of workplace-based observation. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of this strategy to assess feasibility, strengths, and limitations for future use in assessing prehospital ambulance performance.Methods:With support from the Ministry of Health, we sent teams of trained observers to 30 ambulance substations across Ukraine. Using data collection tools on mobile devices, these observers accompanied Advanced Life Support ambulances on urgent calls for periods of 72 hours. We evaluated this program for collecting patient encounter data against the investment of time, personnel, and financial resources.Results:Over a two-month period, we directly observed 524 patient encounters by public ambulances responding to urgent calls at 30 ambulance substations across Ukraine. We employed 6 observers and 2 administrators over this time period. Collecting our observations required 2,160 person-hours at the ambulance substations. The total distance traveled to these sites was 11,375 kilometers. Project costs amounted to 37,000 USD, equating to 71 USD per observed patient encounter.Discussion:Workplace-based assessments are a cost-effective strategy to collect data on the delivery of prehospital care in select populations. This data can be useful for identifying the current state of EMS care delivered and evaluating compliance with established treatment protocols. Successful implementation depends on effective planning and coordination with a commitment of time, personnel, and financial resources. Issues of patient privacy, legal permission, and observer training must be considered.

Introduction:The public ambulance system in Ukraine is the primary deliverer of prehospital care for trauma patients in this Eastern European country, but no national assessment has previously been made to ensure the presence of essential medical equipment on these ambulances.Aim:Working with the Ukraine Ministry of Health, our aim was to assess the availability of public ambulances of medical equipment essential for managing traumatic injury using an internationally recognized standard for prehospital care.Methods:We identified 53 Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulances from randomly selected cities for evaluation. We performed an inventory of available medical equipment and supplies on these ambulances against a matrix of essential equipment for prehospital providers developed by the World Health Organization (WHO).Results:Essential medical equipment in the categories of personal protection, patient monitoring, hemorrhage control, and immobilization were generally available in the ALS public ambulances surveyed. Deficiencies were noted in equipment and supplies for basic and advanced airway monitoring and management.Discussion:Public ALS ambulances across Ukraine are adequately equipped with many essential medical supplies to manage traumatic injury, but have deficiencies in both basic and advanced airway management. Correcting these deficiencies may improve prehospital survival of the traumatically injured patient. The results of this study will enable the Ukraine Ministry of Health to develop requirements of essential medical equipment for all public ALS ambulances in the country, to inform resource allocation decisions, and to guide public health policy regarding prehospital trauma care.