Neutralizing the interaction of the platelet receptor gpIb with VWF is an attractive strategy to treat and prevent thrombotic complications. ALX-0081 is a bivalent Nanobody which specifically targets the gpIb-binding site of VWF and interacts avidly with VWF. Nanobodies are therapeutic proteins derived from naturally occurring heavy-chain-only Abs and combine a small molecular size with a high inherent stability. ALX-0081 exerts potent IntroductionThe successive adhesion, activation, and aggregation of platelets are key processes in arterial thrombus formation after endothelial damage. 1,2 Both rupture of atherosclerotic plaques as well as surgical interventions to treat atherosclerosis (eg, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) may cause exposure of the subendothelium and subsequent clot formation. Eventually, this can result in the occlusion of arteries, leading to ischemia, myocardial infarcts, or stroke. Given the central role of platelets in thrombosis, a substantial number of currently marketed antithrombotic drugs, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and abciximab, target different steps involved in platelet activation and aggregation. 1,2 Thanks to their complementary mechanisms of action, the combination of these agents inhibits platelet aggregation to a greater extent than either agent alone. 3 However, the use of these antiplatelet drugs is hampered by an increased bleeding risk 1,2 and the occurrence of treatment resistance in some patients. 4 Moreover, the irreversible nature of their action can complicate the staunching of bleeding. 1,2 Inhibition of the initial adhesion of platelets to subendothelial collagen provides an alternative strategy to prevent unwanted clot formation. The plasma glycoprotein VWF plays a pivotal role in this adhesion via binding to exposed collagen on the one hand, and the interaction of its A1 domain with the gpIb-IX-V receptor complex on the surface of platelets on the other hand. [5][6][7] Interestingly, the VWF A1 domain is only exposed under high-shear conditions, 8,9 so VWF only acts as a bridging molecule between collagen and platelets in small or stenosed arteries. Therefore, it is expected that drugs inhibiting this interaction between VWF and platelets show an improved safety profile with respect to bleeding tendency. Indeed, the antithrombotic effect of several compounds targeting the gpIb-VWF-A1-axis, like aurintricarboxylic acid, 10-12 recombinant VWF fragments, 10,13-16 a recombinant gpIb chimeric protein, 17,18 anti-VWF mAbs, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and an anti-VWF aptamer 28 has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, without increasing the bleeding risk. 13,[16][17][18]21,23,25,28,29 Nevertheless, until now only 3 drug candidates have been evaluated in humans, including ALX-0081. [30][31][32][33] We developed ALX-0081, a bivalent humanized Nanobody directed against the A1 domain of VWF. Nanobodies are therapeutic proteins derived from the heavy-chain variable domains (VHH) that occur naturally in heavy-chain-only Igs of Camelidae. 34,35 Here we...
Evaluation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties played an important role in the early clinical development of pembrolizumab. Because analysis of data from a traditional 3 + 3 dose‐escalation design revealed several critical uncertainties, a model‐based approach was implemented to better understand these properties. Based on anticipated scenarios for potency and PK nonlinearity, a follow‐up study was designed and thoroughly evaluated. Execution of 14,000 virtual trials led to the selection and implementation of a robust design that extended the low‐dose range by 200‐fold. Modeling of the resulting data demonstrated that pembrolizumab PKs are nonlinear at <0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, but linear in the clinical dose range. Saturation of ex vivo target engagement in blood began at ≥1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and a steady‐state dose of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks was needed to reach 95% target engagement, supporting examination of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks in ongoing trials in melanoma and other advanced cancers.
AIMS : The aim of this analysis was to use a population approach to facilitate the understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to evaluate the influence of patient covariates on the exposure of rivaroxaban in patients with ACS. METHODS : A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using pharmacokinetic samples from 2290 patients in Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 46. The relationship between pharmacokinetics and the primary pharmacodynamic end point, prothrombin time, was evaluated. RESULTS : The pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with ACS was adequately described by an oral one-compartment model. The estimated absorption rate, apparent clearance and volume of distribution were 1.24 h-1 (interindividual variability, 139%), 6.48 l h-1 (31%) and 57.9 l (10%), respectively. Simulations indicate that the influences of renal function, age and bodyweight on exposure in ACS patients are consistent with the findings in previous Phase 1 studies. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations exhibit a close-to-linear relationship with prothrombin time in the ACS population, with little interindividual variability. The estimated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for the ACS patients were comparable to those for venous thromboembolism prevention, deep vein thrombosis and atrial fibrillation patients. CONCLUSIONS : The similarity in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban among different patient populations and the low interindividual variability in the exposureprothrombin time relationship indicate that the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban is highly predictable and consistent across all the patient populations studied
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.