Summary It is known that evolution by selection on new or standing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vitamin K 2,3-epoxide reductase subcomponent 1 (vkorc1) of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) can cause resistance to anticoagulant rodenticides such as warfarin [1–3]. Here we report an introgression in European M. m. domesticus spanning as much as ~20.3 megabases (Mb) and including vkorc1, the molecular target of anticoagulants [1–4], that stems from hybridization with the Algerian mouse (M. spretus). We show that in the laboratory the homozygous complete vkorc1 allele of M. spretus confers resistance when introgressed into M. m. domesticus. Consistent with selection on the introgression after the introduction of rodenticides in the 1950s we document historically adaptive population genetics of vkorc1 in M. m. domesticus. Furthermore, we detected adaptive protein evolution of vkorc1 in the M. spretus lineage (Ka/Ks=1.54–1.93) resulting in radical amino-acid substitutions that apparently have anticoagulant tolerance of M. spretus as pleiotropic effect. Thus, positive selection produced an adaptive, divergent and pleiotropic vkorc1 allele in the donor species, M. spretus, which crossed a species barrier where it is expressed as adaptive trait in the recipient species, M. m. domesticus. Resistant house mice originated from selection on new or standing vkorc1 polymorphisms and from selection on vkorc1 polymorphisms acquired by adaptive introgressive hybridization.

This paper presents a reappraisal of the blood clotting response (BCR) tests for anticoagulant rodenticides, and proposes a standardised methodology for identifying and quantifying physiological resistance in populations of rodent species. The standardisation is based on the International Normalised Ratio, which is standardised against a WHO international reference preparation of thromboplastin, and allows comparison of data obtained using different thromboplastin reagents. The methodology is statistically sound, being based on the 50% response, and has been validated against the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and the house mouse (Mus domesticus). Susceptibility baseline data are presented for warfarin, diphacinone, chlorophacinone and coumatetralyl against the Norway rat, and for bromadiolone, difenacoum, difethialone, flocoumafen and brodifacoum against the Norway rat and the house mouse. A 'test dose' of twice the ED 50 can be used for initial identification of resistance, and will provide a similar level of information to previously published methods. Higher multiples of the ED 50 can be used to assess the resistance factor, and to predict the likely impact on field control.

The study showed that, although the RF for difenacoum among rats carrying the Y139C SNP was apparently low, an acceptable level of control of resistant Norway rat infestations was not achieved using difenacoum. Continued use of anticoagulants against rats that are resistant to them will exacerbate resistance problems in terms of both increased severity and prevalence. These conclusions are likely to apply elsewhere in Europe where the Y139C SNP occurs.

BCR tests based on the use of the INR and baselines are suitable for determining the incidence and for assessing the level of resistance in populations of Norway rats. The majority of rats of the Westphalian resistant strain, characterised by the Y139C marker in VKOR, are resistant to bromadiolone under practical control conditions.

From 26 to 28 May 2004 an international seminar was held in Wageningen, the Netherlands, about current knowledge and advice on rodent management on organic pig and poultry farms in Western Europe. This paper summarizes the discussions. Rodent management is necessary to protect the food production chain from health hazards to livestock and humans. Some organic farmers prefer biological rodent control, but since rodents can also transmit diseases this bears certain risks for the production of healthy livestock and safe food. Effective rodent management requires a thorough understanding of the biology of the pest species concerned. These can be divided into two groups: field rodents, such as voles, and commensal rodents like house mice and rats. The objective of managing field rodents is to minimize livestock exposure to these vectors, and to regulate their populations in case their density is expect-195 NJAS 52-2, 2004 ed to grow dramatically. Infestation of livestock facilities with commensal rodents can be prevented, but once they are present, their eradication must be aimed for. General elements of rodent management are (1) the prevention of rodent infestations through strategic actions such as modifying the habitat or rodent proofing of the buildings, (2) monitoring their appearance and population density, and (3) rodent control measures. A number of possible management actions is described to provide a basis for examining the measures' social acceptability, their economic and environmental impacts, and their efficacy.